Server-Side Template Injection
What is Server-Side Template Injection?
Many modern web frameworks use template engines to dynamically generate HTML content. However, if an application naively incorporates untrusted input into a template, an attacker can craft payloads that execute system commands, leak sensitive data, or even achieve full Remote Code Execution (RCE).
What is the risk of Server-Side Template Injection?
Template engines such as Jinja2 (Flask, Django) are highly vulnerable because they expose powerful internal objects. Others like Pug/Jade (Node.js) allow arbitrary JavaScript execution, while FreeMarker (Java) can expose classpath details and run system commands.
In a worst-case scenario, an SSTI vulnerability can provide an attacker full control over the web server, allowing them to install malware, escalate privileges, and launch further attacks on internal networks.
How can you prevent Server-Side Template Injection?
Another effective mitigation is to use a logic-less template engine like Mustache. Engines like Jinja2 allow code execution within templates, but Mustache treats all input strictly as data, making it immune to SSTI attacks.
A defense-in-depth approach is also recommended. Running the template engine inside a restricted execution environment, such as a Docker container or an isolated cloud instance, limits the potential damage of an exploited vulnerability.
It is also critical to sanitize user input. Rejecting payloads that contain template syntax like {{, {%, or
${}
can help mitigate attacks. Disabling debugging features in the template engine is another important step, as some engines have interactive debugging features that attackers can abuse.How to fix Server-Side Template Injection?
The best mitigation is to strictly separate user input from template logic and use a secure template rendering approach. Here are examples in Python (Flask) and JavaScript (Node.js) that demonstrate secure template rendering:
from flask import Flask, request, render_template
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/greet', methods=['GET'])
def greet():
user_input = request.args.get('name', 'Guest')
return render_template('greeting.html', name=user_input) # Securely passing user input
if __name__ == '__main__':
app.run(debug=True)
In this secure implementation, user input is passed as a parameter to a predefined template (greeting.html
). This prevents direct execution of untrusted input and eliminates the risk of SSTI.
const express = require('express');
const path = require('path');
const app = express();
// Set up Pug as the template engine (Secure if used properly)
app.set('view engine', 'pug');
app.set('views', path.join(__dirname, 'views'));
app.get('/greet', (req, res) => {
let userInput = req.query.name || 'Guest';
// Render a predefined template with user input safely passed as a variable
res.render('greeting', { name: userInput });
});
app.listen(3000, () => {
console.log('Server running on http://localhost:3000');
});
This secure Node.js implementation uses the Pug template engine. User input is never directly injected into the template syntax but is safely passed as a variable to a predefined template (views/greeting.pug
). This ensures that input is treated as plain text, mitigating SSTI risks.
Note: These scripts are for educational purposes only. Always ensure you have permission before scanning or testing websites you don't own or operate.
Vulnissimo scored the severity risk of this vulnerability to 90 out of 100. This means that it requires immediate attention.
Vulnissimo tests for Server-Side Template Injection and many more. Sharpen your security posture with our advanced web vulnerability scanner.