Vulnerability Scan Result
| Title: | Access Denied |
| Description: | No description found |
| ip_address | 173.222.105.27 |
| country | IT  |
| network_name | Akamai International B.V. |
| asn | AS20940 |
| ip_address | 173.222.105.64 |
| country | IT |
| network_name | Akamai International B.V. |
| asn | AS20940 |
80/tcp | http | AkamaiGHost - |
443/tcp | https | - - |
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| HSTS | Security |
Web Application Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| HSTS | Security |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-200 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Vulnerability description
We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.
Risk description
There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.
Recommendation
We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-1188 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Strapi | CMS |
| WordPress | CMS, Blogs |
| Nuxt.js | JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Static site generator |
| MySQL | Databases |
| PHP | Programming languages |
| Headless UI | UI frameworks |
| Vue.js | JavaScript frameworks |
| Usersnap | Issue trackers, Feature management |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| Usercentrics | Cookie compliance |
| Akamai Bot Manager | Security |
| Matomo Analytics | Analytics |
| DoubleClick Floodlight | Advertising |
| Akamai | CDN |
| HSTS | Security |
| Pinia | JavaScript libraries |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Domain Queried | DNS Record Type | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| www.preprints.org | A | IPv4 address | 173.222.105.64 |
| www.preprints.org | A | IPv4 address | 173.222.105.27 |
| www.preprints.org | AAAA | IPv6 address | 2a02:26f0:8d00:d::adde:6bc9 |
| www.preprints.org | AAAA | IPv6 address | 2a02:26f0:8d00:d::adde:6bd0 |
| www.preprints.org | CNAME | Canonical name | www.preprints.org.edgekey.net |
Risk description
An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.
Recommendation
We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Strapi | CMS |
| WordPress | CMS, Blogs |
| Nuxt.js | JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Static site generator |
| MySQL | Databases |
| PHP | Programming languages |
| Vue.js | JavaScript frameworks |
| Pinia | JavaScript libraries |
| Usersnap | Issue trackers, Feature management |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| Usercentrics | Cookie compliance |
| Akamai Bot Manager | Security |
| Matomo Analytics | Analytics |
| DoubleClick Floodlight | Advertising |
| Akamai | CDN |
| HSTS | Security |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Operating System | Accuracy |
|---|---|
| Linux 4.15 - 5.6 | 100% |
Vulnerability description
OS Detection