Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

https://snapchat.com/t/BHr2bl46 (redirect)

Scanned target: https://www.snapchat.com/@luggi490?locale=de_AT&sid=f90ea95b2f5946abab9b18dec5662741&share_id=6pSf56BdQ666A-2_SzvPhA&invite_id=dZnpHzVU

Submitted: Oct 31, 2025 from VU

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

low

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

Screenshot could not be taken.

Title:	luggi 🐣 (@luggi490) \| Snapchat Storys, Spotlight und Linsen
Description:	luggi 🐣 ist auf Snapchat! (@luggi490) \| 18y \| Letztes Update: 10/25/2025

IP Information

ip_address	34.149.46.130
country	US
network_name	Google LLC
asn	AS396982

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	- -
443/tcp	https	API Gateway -

Web Technologies

No technologies could be detected.

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.snapchat.com/@luggi490	Response headers do not include the X-Content-Type-Options HTTP security header

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the X-Content-Type-Options header. This header is particularly important for preventing Internet Explorer from reinterpreting the content of a web page (MIME-sniffing) and thus overriding the value of the Content-Type header.

Risk description

The risk is that lack of this header could make possible attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting or phishing in Internet Explorer browsers.

Recommendation

We recommend setting the X-Content-Type-Options header such as `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.snapchat.com/@luggi490	Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. frame-ancestors: This directive tells the browser whether you want to allow your site to be framed or not. By preventing a browser from framing your site you can defend against attacks like clickjacking. The recommended value is 'none' or 'self'. script-src: 'self' can be problematic if you host JSONP, Angular or user uploaded files. report-uri: report-uri is deprecated in CSP3. Please use the report-to directive instead.

https://www.snapchat.com/@luggi490

Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. frame-ancestors: This directive tells the browser whether you want to allow your site to be framed or not. By preventing a browser from framing your site you can defend against attacks like clickjacking. The recommended value is 'none' or 'self'. script-src: 'self' can be problematic if you host JSONP, Angular or user uploaded files. report-uri: report-uri is deprecated in CSP3. Please use the report-to directive instead.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header configured for the web application includes unsafe directives. The CSP header activates a protection mechanism implemented in web browsers which prevents exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities (XSS) by restricting the sources from which content can be loaded or executed.

Risk description

For example, if the unsafe-inline directive is present in the CSP header, the execution of inline scripts and event handlers is allowed. This can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the vulnerable application.

Recommendation

Remove the unsafe values from the directives, adopt nonces or hashes for safer inclusion of inline scripts if they are needed, and explicitly define the sources from which scripts, styles, images or other resources can be loaded.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.snapchat.com/@luggi490	Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the `<meta/>` tag with name 'referrer' is not present in the response.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.

Risk description

The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.

Recommendation

The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Method	Vulnerable Parameter	Evidence
https://www.snapchat.com/@luggi490	GET	sid (Query Parameter)	Possible session token `f90ea95b2f5946abab9b18dec5662741` found in the sid query parameter of the HTTP request.

Vulnerability description

We found a possible session token exposed in an URL.

Risk description

The risk is that exposed session tokens can help an attacker hijack an existing user session. Placing sensible information within URLs increases the chances of it being leaked, as URLs might be logged in unexpected locations, or may be disclosed via the Referer header.

Recommendation

Session tokens should only be transmitted in HTTP cookies, POST submitted hidden form fields, or specialized auth headers.

Classification

CWE	CWE-200
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
https://www.snapchat.com/robots.txt

Vulnerability description

We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.

Risk description

There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.

Recommendation

We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).

Evidence

URL
Missing: https://www.snapchat.com/.well-known/security.txt

Vulnerability description

We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.

Risk description

There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.

Recommendation

We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Next.js	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
Envoy	Reverse proxies
React	JavaScript frameworks
Google Cloud	IaaS
Amazon Web Services	PaaS
hCaptcha	Security
HSTS	Security
Google Cloud CDN	CDN
DigiCert	SSL/TLS certificate authorities
Amazon S3	CDN
Webpack	Miscellaneous
HTTP/3	Miscellaneous
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
Google Analytics	Analytics

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Next.js	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
Envoy	Reverse proxies
React	JavaScript frameworks
Google Cloud	IaaS
Amazon Web Services	PaaS
hCaptcha	Security
Google Cloud CDN	CDN
DigiCert	SSL/TLS certificate authorities
Amazon S3	CDN
Webpack	Miscellaneous
HTTP/3	Miscellaneous
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
Google Analytics	Analytics

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
www.snapchat.com	A	IPv4 address	34.149.46.130
www.snapchat.com	CNAME	Canonical name	web-gcp.api.snapchat.com

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.