Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

https://www.viewstats.com/@seekersofdecay/videos/Zpy1tCC2XrA/ (redirect)

Scanned target: https://www.viewstats.com/@seekersofdecay/videos/Zpy1tCC2XrA

Submitted: Jun 21, 2026 from NL

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

high

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

https://www.viewstats.com/@seekersofdecay/videos/Zpy1tCC2XrA/

Title:	Seekers of decay - Viewstats
Description:	Find more daily YouTube data insights of Seekers of decay using Viewstats with features like detailed charts for video and channel data, projections, similar channels, video performance, and outliers.

IP Information

ip_address	104.26.12.41
country	US
network_name	Cloudflare, Inc.
asn	AS13335

ip_address	172.67.75.97
country	US
network_name	Cloudflare, Inc.
asn	AS13335

ip_address	104.26.13.41
country	US
network_name	Cloudflare, Inc.
asn	AS13335

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	Cloudflare http proxy -
443/tcp	https	cloudflare -
2082/tcp	http	Cloudflare http proxy -
2083/tcp	https	nginx -
2086/tcp	http	Cloudflare http proxy -
2087/tcp	https	nginx -
8080/tcp	http	Cloudflare http proxy -
8443/tcp	https-alt	cloudflare -

Web Technologies

Software / Version	Category
Twitter Ads	Advertising
Amazon Web Services	PaaS
Linkedin Ads	Advertising
Linkedin Insight Tag	Analytics
Apple Sign-in	Authentication
ECharts	JavaScript graphics
Facebook Pixel 2.9.408	Analytics
core-js 3.32.2	JavaScript libraries
Google Analytics GA4	Analytics
Mixpanel	Analytics
Framer Motion	JavaScript libraries
Material UI	UI frameworks
MySQL	Databases
Next.js 14.2.35	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
Next.js App Router	JavaScript frameworks, Web servers
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
PHP	Programming languages
React	JavaScript frameworks
Statsig 3.30.2	Analytics, Feature management
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
Tolt	Affiliate programs
UserWay	Accessibility
Vercel	PaaS
Webpack	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
Cloudflare	CDN
Rewardful	Affiliate programs
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
jsDelivr	CDN
Lodash 4.17.21	JavaScript libraries
Profitwell	Analytics
HSTS	Security

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

CVE	CVSS	EPSS Score	EPSS Percentile	Summary
CVE-2026-44578	8.6	0.01895	0.78719	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 13.4.13 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, self-hosted applications using the built-in Node.js server can be vulnerable to server-side request forgery through crafted WebSocket upgrade requests. An attacker can cause the server to proxy requests to arbitrary internal or external destinations, which may expose internal services or cloud metadata endpoints. Vercel-hosted deployments are not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5.
CVE-2026-64649	8.3	0.00459	0.37076	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. In versions 14.1.1 through 15.5.20 and 16.0.0 through 16.2.10, when a Server Action forwards or redirects a request, an attacker can cause the server to send that outbound request to a malicious host (Server-Side Request Forgery). This requires the attacker's request to control Host-associated headers. In some configurations, it's also possible to obtain internal values that weaken middleware/proxy authorization. Applications that use Server Actions are affected when the incoming host header is not fixed to a trusted value. This typically occurs on custom servers, or on deployments not behind a proxy that pins the host. Managed hosting pins the host upstream and is not affected; next start and standalone output do the same from version 14.2 onward. This issue has been fixed in versions 15.5.21 and 16.2.11.
CVE-2026-64645	8.3	0.00414	0.32882	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. In versions 12.0.0 through 15.5.20 and 16.0.0 through 16.2.10, a rewrites() or redirects() rule that builds its external destination hostname from request-controlled input can be pointed at an arbitrary hostname, regardless of the rule's hostname suffix. For a rewrite, Next.js proxies the request to that arbitrary host and serves the response from the application's origin, leading to Server-Side Request forgery. A redirects() rule configured this way is vulnerable to an Open Redirect. This issue has been fixed in versions 15.5.21 and 16.2.11.
CVE-2026-64641	8.2	0.00856	0.56558	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. In versions 13.0.0 through 15.5.20 and 16.0.0 through 16.2.10, crafted requests targeting Next.js applications using App Router with at least one Server Action can lead to excessive CPU usage blocking processing of further requests in the same process. This issue has been fixed in versions 15.5.21 and 16.2.11.
CVE-2026-44573	7.5	0.00761	0.53356	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 12.2.0 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, Applications using the Pages Router with i18n configured and middleware/proxy-based authorization can allow unauthorized access to protected page data through locale-less /_next/data/<buildId>/<page>.json requests. In affected configurations, middleware does not run for the unprefixed data route, allowing an attacker to retrieve SSR JSON for protected pages without passing the intended authorization checks. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5.

Vulnerability description

Outdated or vulnerable software components include versions of server-side software that are no longer supported or have known, publicly disclosed vulnerabilities. Using outdated software significantly increases the attack surface of a system and may allow unauthorized access, data leaks, or service disruptions. Vulnerabilities in these components are often well-documented and actively exploited by attackers. Without security patches or vendor support, any weaknesses remain unmitigated, exposing the application to risks. In some cases, even after patching, the reported version may remain unchanged, requiring manual verification.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could search for an appropriate exploit (or create one himself) for any of these vulnerabilities and use it to attack the system. Since the vulnerabilities were discovered using only version-based testing, the risk level for this finding will not exceed 'high' severity. Critical risks will be assigned to vulnerabilities identified through accurate active testing methods.

Recommendation

In order to eliminate the risk of these vulnerabilities, we recommend you check the installed software version and upgrade to the latest version.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1035
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

CVE	CVSS	EPSS Score	EPSS Percentile	Summary
CVE-2026-4800	8.1	0.02618	0.84794	Impact: The fix for CVE-2021-23337 (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-35jh-r3h4-6jhm) added validation for the variable option in _.template but did not apply the same validation to options.imports key names. Both paths flow into the same Function() constructor sink. When an application passes untrusted input as options.imports key names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time. Additionally, _.template uses assignInWith to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via for..in. If Object.prototype has been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed to Function(). Patches: Users should upgrade to version 4.18.0. Workarounds: Do not pass untrusted input as key names in options.imports. Only use developer-controlled, static key names.
CVE-2025-13465	6.9	0.0185	0.78172	Lodash versions 4.0.0 through 4.17.22 are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the _.unset and _.omit functions. An attacker can pass crafted paths which cause Lodash to delete methods from global prototypes. The issue permits deletion of properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior. This issue is patched on 4.17.23
CVE-2026-2950	6.5	0.00377	0.28871	Impact: Lodash versions 4.17.23 and earlier are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the _.unset and _.omit functions. The fix for (CVE-2025-13465: https://github.com/lodash/lodash/security/advisories/GHSA-xxjr-mmjv-4gpg) only guards against string key members, so an attacker can bypass the check by passing array-wrapped path segments. This allows deletion of properties from built-in prototypes such as Object.prototype, Number.prototype, and String.prototype. The issue permits deletion of prototype properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior. Patches: This issue is patched in 4.18.0. Workarounds: None. Upgrade to the patched version.

Vulnerability description

Risk description

Recommendation

In order to eliminate the risk of these vulnerabilities, we recommend you check the installed software version and upgrade to the latest version.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1035
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Cookie Name	Evidence
https://www.viewstats.com/@seekersofdecay/videos/Zpy1tCC2XrA	vs-bot-threshold	The server responded with Set-Cookie header(s) that does not specify the HttpOnly flag: Set-Cookie: vs-bot-threshold=0.621716052178683

Vulnerability description

We found that a cookie has been set without the HttpOnly flag, which means it can be accessed by potentially malicious JavaScript code running inside the web page. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker who injects malicious JavaScript code on the page (e.g. by using an XSS attack) can access the cookie and can send it to another site. In case of a session cookie, this could lead to session hijacking.

Recommendation

Ensure that the HttpOnly flag is set for all cookies.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1004
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Cookie Name	Evidence
https://www.viewstats.com/@seekersofdecay/videos/Zpy1tCC2XrA	vs-bot-threshold	Set-Cookie: vs-bot-threshold=0.621716052178683

Vulnerability description

We found that a cookie has been set without the Secure flag, which means the browser will send it over an unencrypted channel (plain HTTP) if such a request is made. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.

Risk description

The risk exists that an attacker will intercept the clear-text communication between the browser and the server and he will steal the cookie of the user. If this is a session cookie, the attacker could gain unauthorized access to the victim's web session.

Recommendation

Whenever a cookie contains sensitive information or is a session token, then it should always be passed using an encrypted channel. Ensure that the secure flag is set for cookies containing such sensitive information.

Classification

CWE	CWE-614
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.viewstats.com/@seekersofdecay/videos/Zpy1tCC2XrA	Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:frame-ancestors: This directive tells the browser whether you want to allow your site to be framed or not. By preventing a browser from framing your site you can defend against attacks like clickjacking. The recommended value is 'none' or 'self'. object-src: Missing object-src allows the injection of plugins which can execute JavaScript. We recommend setting it to 'none'. base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. script-src: script-src directive is missing. default-src: The default-src directive should be set as a fall-back when other restrictions have not been specified.

https://www.viewstats.com/@seekersofdecay/videos/Zpy1tCC2XrA

Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:frame-ancestors: This directive tells the browser whether you want to allow your site to be framed or not. By preventing a browser from framing your site you can defend against attacks like clickjacking. The recommended value is 'none' or 'self'. object-src: Missing object-src allows the injection of plugins which can execute JavaScript. We recommend setting it to 'none'. base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. script-src: script-src directive is missing. default-src: The default-src directive should be set as a fall-back when other restrictions have not been specified.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header configured for the web application includes unsafe directives. The CSP header activates a protection mechanism implemented in web browsers which prevents exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities (XSS) by restricting the sources from which content can be loaded or executed.

Risk description

For example, if the unsafe-inline directive is present in the CSP header, the execution of inline scripts and event handlers is allowed. This can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the vulnerable application.

Recommendation

Remove the unsafe values from the directives, adopt nonces or hashes for safer inclusion of inline scripts if they are needed, and explicitly define the sources from which scripts, styles, images or other resources can be loaded.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1021
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Twitter Ads	Advertising
Amazon Web Services	PaaS
Linkedin Ads	Advertising
Linkedin Insight Tag	Analytics
Apple Sign-in	Authentication
ECharts	JavaScript graphics
Facebook Pixel 2.9.408	Analytics
core-js 3.32.2	JavaScript libraries
Google Analytics GA4	Analytics
Mixpanel	Analytics
Framer Motion	JavaScript libraries
Material UI	UI frameworks
MySQL	Databases
Next.js 14.2.35	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
Next.js App Router	JavaScript frameworks, Web servers
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
PHP	Programming languages
React	JavaScript frameworks
Statsig 3.30.2	Analytics, Feature management
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
Tolt	Affiliate programs
UserWay	Accessibility
Vercel	PaaS
Webpack	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
Cloudflare	CDN
Rewardful	Affiliate programs
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
jsDelivr	CDN
Lodash 4.17.21	JavaScript libraries
Profitwell	Analytics
HSTS	Security

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Classification

CWE	CWE-200
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.viewstats.com/@seekersofdecay/videos/Zpy1tCC2XrA	Response headers do not include the X-Content-Type-Options HTTP security header

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the X-Content-Type-Options header. This header is particularly important for preventing Internet Explorer from reinterpreting the content of a web page (MIME-sniffing) and thus overriding the value of the Content-Type header.

Risk description

The risk is that lack of this header could make possible attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting or phishing in Internet Explorer browsers.

Recommendation

We recommend setting the X-Content-Type-Options header such as `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
https://www.viewstats.com/robots.txt

Vulnerability description

We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.

Risk description

There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.

Recommendation

We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Cloudflare	CDN

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Cloudflare	CDN

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Cloudflare	CDN

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Operating System	Accuracy
FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE	91%

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
Next.js	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
MySQL	Databases
PHP	Programming languages
Apple Sign-in	Authentication
Radix UI	UI frameworks
Material UI	UI frameworks
React	JavaScript frameworks
Amazon Web Services	PaaS
Vercel	PaaS
UserWay	Accessibility
Twitter Ads	Advertising
Tolt	Affiliate programs
Rewardful	Affiliate programs
Profitwell	Analytics
Linkedin Insight Tag	Analytics
Linkedin Ads	Advertising
jsDelivr	CDN
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
Google Analytics GA4	Analytics
Facebook Pixel 2.9.408	Analytics
Cloudflare Browser Insights	Analytics, RUM
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
HSTS	Security
Cloudflare	CDN
Webpack	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
Open Graph	Miscellaneous

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
www.viewstats.com	A	IPv4 address	172.67.75.97
www.viewstats.com	A	IPv4 address	104.26.13.41
www.viewstats.com	A	IPv4 address	104.26.12.41
www.viewstats.com	AAAA	IPv6 address	2606:4700:20::681a:c29
www.viewstats.com	AAAA	IPv6 address	2606:4700:20::681a:d29
www.viewstats.com	AAAA	IPv6 address	2606:4700:20::ac43:4b61

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.