Vulnerability Scan Result
| Title: | Log in |
| Description: | Build apps with a single prompt! Whether it's an intranet, client portal, or an internal tool, see your prompts come to life with a fully functional web app. |
| ip_address | 35.158.87.123 |
| country | DE  |
| network_name | Amazon.com, Inc. |
| asn | AS16509 |
80/tcp | http | my-server - |
443/tcp | https | my-server - |
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Font Awesome 6.5.0 | Font scripts |
| Bootstrap 4.6.2 | UI frameworks |
| jQuery 3.7.0 | JavaScript libraries |
| Open Graph | Miscellaneous |
| Popper 1.14.7 | Miscellaneous |
| jsDelivr | CDN |
| HSTS | Security |
| STN Video | Advertising, Video players |
Web Application Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://www.ledgionportal.online/login | Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.
Risk description
The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.
Recommendation
Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-693 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Font Awesome 6.5.0 | Font scripts |
| Bootstrap 4.6.2 | UI frameworks |
| jQuery 3.7.0 | JavaScript libraries |
| Open Graph | Miscellaneous |
| Popper 1.14.7 | Miscellaneous |
| jsDelivr | CDN |
| HSTS | Security |
| STN Video | Advertising, Video players |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
Vulnerability description
We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.
Risk description
There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.
Recommendation
We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).
Evidence
| URL | Method | Parameters | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.ledgionportal.online/login | GET | Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 | Suspicious comment TODO found in: |
Vulnerability description
We have discovered that the target application's code contains suspicious comments that may be related to potential bugs, incomplete functionality, or weaknesses. These comments often arise during development and testing phases but are inadvertently left in the code.
Risk description
The risk exists that attackers could analyze these comments to identify vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the application. While comments themselves do not directly lead to security breaches, they may guide attackers to focus their efforts on specific parts of the application, potentially uncovering and exploiting vulnerabilities.
Recommendation
Remove comments that suggest the presence of bugs, incomplete functionality, or weaknesses, before deploying the application.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-209 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Method | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| https://www.ledgionportal.online/login | OPTIONS | We did a HTTP OPTIONS request. The server responded with a 200 status code and the header: `Allow: GET,HEAD,OPTIONS` Request / Response |
Vulnerability description
We have noticed that the webserver responded with an Allow HTTP header when an OPTIONS HTTP request was sent. This method responds to requests by providing information about the methods available for the target resource.
Risk description
The only risk this might present nowadays is revealing debug HTTP methods that can be used on the server. This can present a danger if any of those methods can lead to sensitive information, like authentication information, secret keys.
Recommendation
We recommend that you check for unused HTTP methods or even better, disable the OPTIONS method. This can be done using your webserver configuration.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-16 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities
Evidence
We found insecure DNS cookie usage on the following nameservers: ns1.dns-parking.com, ns2.dns-parking.com
Vulnerability description
We found that the server does not implement DNS Cookies or uses them insecurely. DNS Cookies help prevent DNS-based attacks, such as spoofing and amplification attacks.
Risk description
The risk exists because without DNS Cookies, the server is vulnerable to DNS spoofing and amplification attacks. Attackers can manipulate responses or use the server in distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, compromising network availability and security.
Recommendation
We recommend enabling DNS Cookies to prevent spoofed DNS responses. Ensure proper cookie validation is implemented to mitigate DNS amplification attacks. Regularly update DNS servers to support the latest DNS security features.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Bootstrap 4.6.2 | UI frameworks |
| STN Video | Advertising, Video players |
| jsDelivr | CDN |
| jQuery 3.7.0 | JavaScript libraries |
| HSTS | Security |
| Popper 1.14.7 | Miscellaneous |
| Font Awesome 6.5.0 | Font scripts |
| Open Graph | Miscellaneous |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Domain Queried | DNS Record Type | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| www.ledgionportal.online | A | IPv4 address | 35.158.87.123 |
| www.ledgionportal.online | NS | Name server | ns1.dns-parking.com |
| www.ledgionportal.online | NS | Name server | ns2.dns-parking.com |
| www.ledgionportal.online | SOA | Start of Authority | ns1.dns-parking.com. dns.hostinger.com. 2026021201 10000 2400 604800 600 |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issue "sectigo.com" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issuewild "globalsign.com" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issue "comodoca.com" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issue "pki.goog" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issue "globalsign.com" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issue "letsencrypt.org" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issuewild "letsencrypt.org" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issuewild "comodoca.com" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issue "digicert.com" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issuewild "pki.goog" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issuewild "sectigo.com" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issuewild "digicert.com" |
| www.ledgionportal.online | CNAME | Canonical name | ledgionportal.online |
Risk description
An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.
Recommendation
We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.