Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

http://lwolf.com/ (redirect)

Scanned target: https://www.lwolf.com/

Submitted: Apr 17, 2026 from HT

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

medium

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

Title:	Complete real estate brokerage software \| Lone Wolf Technologies
Description:	Lone Wolf Technologies offers the only end-to-end real estate software platform for brokerages and agents. Trusted by 9000+ brokerages across North America.

IP Information

ip_address	216.150.1.129
country	US
network_name	Amazon.com, Inc.
asn	AS16509

ip_address	216.150.16.129
country	US
network_name	Amazon.com, Inc.
asn	AS16509

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	Vercel -
443/tcp	https	Vercel -

Web Technologies

Software / Version	Category
Microsoft Advertising	Advertising
Reddit Ads	Advertising
Amazon Web Services	PaaS
Linkedin Insight Tag	Analytics
Microsoft Clarity	Analytics
Crazy Egg	Analytics
Dreamdata	Marketing automation, Analytics
Facebook Pixel 2.9.300	Analytics
core-js 3.32.2	JavaScript libraries
Google Analytics	Analytics
MySQL	Databases
Next.js 15.2.8	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
Next.js App Router	JavaScript frameworks, Web servers
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
PHP	Programming languages
Piwik PRO Core	Analytics
PyScript	Miscellaneous
Python	Programming languages
React	JavaScript frameworks
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
Swiper	JavaScript libraries
Vercel	PaaS
Webpack	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
ClickCease	Security
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
Marketo 165	Marketing automation
HSTS	Security
Sanity	CMS
Seers	Cookie compliance

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

CVE	CVSS	EPSS Score	EPSS Percentile	Summary
CVE-2026-27980	6.9	0.00021	0.05484	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 10.0.0 and prior to version 16.1.7, the default Next.js image optimization disk cache (`/_next/image`) did not have a configurable upper bound, allowing unbounded cache growth. An attacker could generate many unique image-optimization variants and exhaust disk space, causing denial of service. This is fixed in version 16.1.7 by adding an LRU-backed disk cache with `images.maximumDiskCacheSize`, including eviction of least-recently-used entries when the limit is exceeded. Setting `maximumDiskCacheSize: 0` disables disk caching. If upgrading is not immediately possible, periodically clean `.next/cache/images` and/or reduce variant cardinality (e.g., tighten values for `images.localPatterns`, `images.remotePatterns`, and `images.qualities`).
CVE-2026-29057	6.3	0.00083	0.24331	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 9.5.0 and prior to versions 15.5.13 and 16.1.7, when Next.js rewrites proxy traffic to an external backend, a crafted `DELETE`/`OPTIONS` request using `Transfer-Encoding: chunked` could trigger request boundary disagreement between the proxy and backend. This could allow request smuggling through rewritten routes. An attacker could smuggle a second request to unintended backend routes (for example, internal/admin endpoints), bypassing assumptions that only the configured rewrite destination/path is reachable. This does not impact applications hosted on providers that handle rewrites at the CDN level, such as Vercel. The vulnerability originated in an upstream library vendored by Next.js. It is fixed in Next.js 15.5.13 and 16.1.7 by updating that dependency’s behavior so `content-length: 0` is added only when both `content-length` and `transfer-encoding` are absent, and `transfer-encoding` is no longer removed in that code path. If upgrading is not immediately possible, block chunked `DELETE`/`OPTIONS` requests on rewritten routes at the edge/proxy, and/or enforce authentication/authorization on backend routes.
CVE-2025-59472	5.9	0.00089	0.25352	A denial of service vulnerability exists in Next.js versions with Partial Prerendering (PPR) enabled when running in minimal mode. The PPR resume endpoint accepts unauthenticated POST requests with the `Next-Resume: 1` header and processes attacker-controlled postponed state data. Two closely related vulnerabilities allow an attacker to crash the server process through memory exhaustion: 1. Unbounded request body buffering: The server buffers the entire POST request body into memory using `Buffer.concat()` without enforcing any size limit, allowing arbitrarily large payloads to exhaust available memory. 2. Unbounded decompression (zipbomb): The resume data cache is decompressed using `inflateSync()` without limiting the decompressed output size. A small compressed payload can expand to hundreds of megabytes or gigabytes, causing memory exhaustion. Both attack vectors result in a fatal V8 out-of-memory error (`FATAL ERROR: Reached heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory`) causing the Node.js process to terminate. The zipbomb variant is particularly dangerous as it can bypass reverse proxy request size limits while still causing large memory allocation on the server. To be affected you must have an application running with `experimental.ppr: true` or `cacheComponents: true` configured along with the NEXT_PRIVATE_MINIMAL_MODE=1 environment variable. Strongly consider upgrading to 15.6.0-canary.61 or 16.1.5 to reduce risk and prevent availability issues in Next applications.
CVE-2025-59471	5.9	0.00027	0.07633	A denial of service vulnerability exists in self-hosted Next.js applications that have `remotePatterns` configured for the Image Optimizer. The image optimization endpoint (`/_next/image`) loads external images entirely into memory without enforcing a maximum size limit, allowing an attacker to cause out-of-memory conditions by requesting optimization of arbitrarily large images. This vulnerability requires that `remotePatterns` is configured to allow image optimization from external domains and that the attacker can serve or control a large image on an allowed domain. Strongly consider upgrading to 15.5.10 or 16.1.5 to reduce risk and prevent availability issues in Next applications.

Vulnerability description

Outdated or vulnerable software components include versions of server-side software that are no longer supported or have known, publicly disclosed vulnerabilities. Using outdated software significantly increases the attack surface of a system and may allow unauthorized access, data leaks, or service disruptions. Vulnerabilities in these components are often well-documented and actively exploited by attackers. Without security patches or vendor support, any weaknesses remain unmitigated, exposing the application to risks. In some cases, even after patching, the reported version may remain unchanged, requiring manual verification.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could search for an appropriate exploit (or create one himself) for any of these vulnerabilities and use it to attack the system. Since the vulnerabilities were discovered using only version-based testing, the risk level for this finding will not exceed 'high' severity. Critical risks will be assigned to vulnerabilities identified through accurate active testing methods.

Recommendation

In order to eliminate the risk of these vulnerabilities, we recommend you check the installed software version and upgrade to the latest version.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1035
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.lwolf.com/	Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.

Risk description

The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.

Recommendation

Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1021
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.lwolf.com/	Response headers do not include the X-Content-Type-Options HTTP security header

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the X-Content-Type-Options header. This header is particularly important for preventing Internet Explorer from reinterpreting the content of a web page (MIME-sniffing) and thus overriding the value of the Content-Type header.

Risk description

The risk is that lack of this header could make possible attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting or phishing in Internet Explorer browsers.

Recommendation

We recommend setting the X-Content-Type-Options header such as `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.lwolf.com/	Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the `<meta/>` tag with name 'referrer' is not present in the response.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.

Risk description

The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.

Recommendation

The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
https://www.lwolf.com/robots.txt

Vulnerability description

We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.

Risk description

There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.

Recommendation

We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Microsoft Advertising	Advertising
Reddit Ads	Advertising
Amazon Web Services	PaaS
Linkedin Insight Tag	Analytics
Microsoft Clarity	Analytics
Crazy Egg	Analytics
Dreamdata	Marketing automation, Analytics
Facebook Pixel 2.9.300	Analytics
core-js 3.32.2	JavaScript libraries
Google Analytics	Analytics
MySQL	Databases
Next.js 15.2.8	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
Next.js App Router	JavaScript frameworks, Web servers
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
PHP	Programming languages
Piwik PRO Core	Analytics
PyScript	Miscellaneous
Python	Programming languages
React	JavaScript frameworks
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
Swiper	JavaScript libraries
Vercel	PaaS
Webpack	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
ClickCease	Security
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
Marketo 165	Marketing automation
HSTS	Security
Sanity	CMS
Seers	Cookie compliance

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Classification

CWE	CWE-200
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
Missing: https://www.lwolf.com/.well-known/security.txt

Vulnerability description

We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.

Risk description

There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.

Recommendation

We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1188
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
MySQL	Databases
PHP	Programming languages
Python	Programming languages
Vercel	PaaS
Amazon Web Services	PaaS
Piwik PRO Core	Analytics
Seers	Cookie compliance
Reddit Ads	Advertising
Microsoft Advertising	Advertising
Marketo	Marketing automation
Linkedin Insight Tag	Analytics
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
Google Analytics	Analytics
Facebook Pixel	Analytics
Dreamdata	Marketing automation, Analytics
Crazy Egg	Analytics
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
ClickCease	Security
HSTS	Security
PyScript	Miscellaneous

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Operating System	Accuracy
Android 5.0.1	90%

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
www.lwolf.com	A	IPv4 address	216.150.16.65
www.lwolf.com	A	IPv4 address	216.150.1.65
www.lwolf.com	CAA	Certificate Authority Authorization	0 issue "globalsign.com"
www.lwolf.com	CAA	Certificate Authority Authorization	0 issue "letsencrypt.org"
www.lwolf.com	CAA	Certificate Authority Authorization	0 issue "pki.goog"
www.lwolf.com	CAA	Certificate Authority Authorization	0 issue "sectigo.com"
www.lwolf.com	CNAME	Canonical name	879a21467bc65882.vercel-dns-016.com

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.