Vulnerability Scan Result
| Title: | Just a moment... |
| Description: | No description found |
| ip_address | 15.197.225.128 |
| country | US  |
| network_name | Amazon.com, Inc. |
| asn | AS16509 |
| ip_address | 3.33.251.168 |
| country | US |
| network_name | Amazon.com, Inc. |
| asn | AS16509 |
80/tcp | http | awselb/2.0 - |
443/tcp | https | - - |
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Google Ads | Advertising |
| Amazon Web Services | PaaS |
| Amazon ELB | Load balancers |
| Google Analytics GA4 | Analytics |
| HTTP/3 | Miscellaneous |
| Simpli.fi | Advertising |
| Google Ads Conversion Tracking | Analytics |
| Google Call Conversion Tracking | Analytics |
| Microsoft ASP.NET | Web frameworks |
| Cloudflare | CDN |
| Cloudflare Bot Management | Security |
| reCAPTCHA | Security |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| OneTrust | Cookie compliance |
| HSTS | Security |
Web Application Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Google Ads | Advertising |
| Amazon Web Services | PaaS |
| Amazon ELB | Load balancers |
| Google Analytics GA4 | Analytics |
| HTTP/3 | Miscellaneous |
| Simpli.fi | Advertising |
| Google Ads Conversion Tracking | Analytics |
| Google Call Conversion Tracking | Analytics |
| Microsoft ASP.NET | Web frameworks |
| Cloudflare | CDN |
| Cloudflare Bot Management | Security |
| reCAPTCHA | Security |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| OneTrust | Cookie compliance |
| HSTS | Security |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| http://mila-stl.com/ | Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.
Risk description
The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.
Recommendation
Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-693 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Vulnerability description
We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.
Risk description
There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.
Recommendation
We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities
Evidence
We found insecure DNS cookie usage on the following nameservers: ns75.domaincontrol.com, ns76.domaincontrol.com
Vulnerability description
We found that the server does not implement DNS Cookies or uses them insecurely. DNS Cookies help prevent DNS-based attacks, such as spoofing and amplification attacks.
Risk description
The risk exists because without DNS Cookies, the server is vulnerable to DNS spoofing and amplification attacks. Attackers can manipulate responses or use the server in distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, compromising network availability and security.
Recommendation
We recommend enabling DNS Cookies to prevent spoofed DNS responses. Ensure proper cookie validation is implemented to mitigate DNS amplification attacks. Regularly update DNS servers to support the latest DNS security features.
Evidence
| Domain Queried | DNS Record Type | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| mila-stl.com | A | IPv4 address | 15.197.225.128 |
| mila-stl.com | A | IPv4 address | 3.33.251.168 |
| mila-stl.com | NS | Name server | ns75.domaincontrol.com |
| mila-stl.com | NS | Name server | ns76.domaincontrol.com |
| mila-stl.com | SOA | Start of Authority | ns75.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2025080400 28800 7200 604800 600 |
Risk description
An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.
Recommendation
We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Vimeo | Video players |
| Amazon ELB | Load balancers |
| Amazon Web Services | PaaS |
| Google Ads | Advertising |
| Simpli.fi | Advertising |
| OneTrust | Cookie compliance |
| Google Ads Conversion Tracking | Analytics |
| Cloudflare Browser Insights | Analytics, RUM |
| Cloudflare Bot Management | Security |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| Google Call Conversion Tracking | Analytics |
| Google Analytics GA4 | Analytics |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
| HSTS | Security |
| Cloudflare | CDN |
| PWA | Miscellaneous |
| HTTP/3 | Miscellaneous |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Microsoft ASP.NET | Web frameworks |
| Amazon ELB | Load balancers |
| Amazon Web Services | PaaS |
| Google Ads | Advertising |
| Simpli.fi | Advertising |
| OneTrust | Cookie compliance |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| Google Call Conversion Tracking | Analytics |
| Google Analytics GA4 | Analytics |
| Google Ads Conversion Tracking | Analytics |
| Cloudflare Browser Insights | Analytics, RUM |
| Cloudflare Bot Management | Security |
| reCAPTCHA | Security |
| HSTS | Security |
| Cloudflare | CDN |
| HTTP/3 | Miscellaneous |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.