Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

http://quotecheck.chat/ (redirect)

Scanned target: https://www.quotecheck.chat/

Submitted: Feb 18, 2026 from GT

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

low

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

Screenshot could not be taken.

Title:	QuoteCheck - Is This Price Fair?
Description:	Instantly analyze any service quote to see if you're being overcharged. Car repairs, plumbing, dental work, home renovations and more. Save thousands with AI-powered price analysis.

IP Information

ip_address	64.29.17.1
country	US
network_name	Amazon.com, Inc.
asn	AS16509

ip_address	216.198.79.1
country	US
network_name	Amazon.com, Inc.
asn	AS16509

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	Vercel -
443/tcp	https	Vercel -

Web Technologies

Software / Version	Category
Lucide	Font scripts
Next.js 16.1.6	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
React	JavaScript frameworks
Vercel	PaaS
Webpack	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
HSTS	Security

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.quotecheck.chat/	Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the `<meta/>` tag with name 'referrer' is not present in the response.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.

Risk description

The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.

Recommendation

The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Method	Parameters	Evidence
https://www.quotecheck.chat/login	GET	Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36	The following form sends inputs of type password plainly in the URL: ` Email Password <a class="text-xs text-prim... (truncated)
https://www.quotecheck.chat/signup	GET	Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36	The following form sends inputs of type password plainly in the URL: ` Full name Email Password

Vulnerability description

We found a form which is submitted using a GET method and has inputs of the type password. The end result is that passwords are submitted in URLs.

Risk description

Passwords submitted in URLs have a higher chance of being leaked. The main reason is that URLs can be leaked in browser cross-site requests via the Referer header. Additionally, URLs are usually stored in all kinds of logs. If any access or error logs of the server were publicly accessible, an attacker could also harvest password from it.

Recommendation

You should submit passwords using POST rather than GET. This way sensitive data won't be shared to other locations via URLs.

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.quotecheck.chat/	Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.

Risk description

The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.

Recommendation

Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Lucide	Font scripts
Next.js 16.1.6	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
React	JavaScript frameworks
Vercel	PaaS
Webpack	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
HSTS	Security

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.quotecheck.chat/	Response headers do not include the X-Content-Type-Options HTTP security header

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the X-Content-Type-Options header. This header is particularly important for preventing Internet Explorer from reinterpreting the content of a web page (MIME-sniffing) and thus overriding the value of the Content-Type header.

Risk description

The risk is that lack of this header could make possible attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting or phishing in Internet Explorer browsers.

Recommendation

We recommend setting the X-Content-Type-Options header such as `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
Missing: https://www.quotecheck.chat/.well-known/security.txt

Vulnerability description

We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.

Risk description

There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.

Recommendation

We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.

Evidence

URL Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.quotecheck.chat/signup	<input type="email" placeholder="you@example.com" class="w-full border border-gray-200 rounded-xl px-4 py-2.5 text-sm focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-primary/20 focus:border-primary" required="" value=""> <input type="password" placeholder="At least 8 characters" class="w-full border border-gray-200 rounded-xl px-4 py-2.5 pr-10 text-sm focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-primary/20 focus:border-primary" required="" minlength="8" value=""> <button type="submit" class="w-full bg-primary text-white py-2.5 rounded-xl font-semibold hover:bg-primary-dark transition disabled:opacity-60 flex items-center justify-center gap-2">Create Account</button>

https://www.quotecheck.chat/signup

<input type="email" placeholder="you@example.com" class="w-full border border-gray-200 rounded-xl px-4 py-2.5 text-sm focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-primary/20 focus:border-primary" required="" value=""> <input type="password" placeholder="At least 8 characters" class="w-full border border-gray-200 rounded-xl px-4 py-2.5 pr-10 text-sm focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-primary/20 focus:border-primary" required="" minlength="8" value=""> <button type="submit" class="w-full bg-primary text-white py-2.5 rounded-xl font-semibold hover:bg-primary-dark transition disabled:opacity-60 flex items-center justify-center gap-2">Create Account</button>

Vulnerability description

We have discovered that the target application presents a login interface that could be a potential target for attacks. While login interfaces are standard for user authentication, they can become vulnerabilities if not properly secured.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this interface to mount brute force attacks against known passwords and usernames combinations leaked throughout the web.

Recommendation

Ensure each interface is not bypassable using common knowledge of the application or leaked credentials using occasional password audits.

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
www.quotecheck.chat	A	IPv4 address	216.198.79.1
www.quotecheck.chat	A	IPv4 address	64.29.17.1
www.quotecheck.chat	CAA	Certificate Authority Authorization	0 issue "globalsign.com"
www.quotecheck.chat	CAA	Certificate Authority Authorization	0 issue "letsencrypt.org"
www.quotecheck.chat	CAA	Certificate Authority Authorization	0 issue "sectigo.com"
www.quotecheck.chat	CNAME	Canonical name	98d045fa473603c7.vercel-dns-017.com

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.

Operating System	Accuracy
Android 5.0.1	90%

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Next.js 16.1.6	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
Vercel	PaaS
React	JavaScript frameworks
HSTS	Security
Webpack	Miscellaneous

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.