Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

https://studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app/ (redirect)

Scanned target: https://studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app/login?from=%2F

Submitted: Nov 05, 2025 from GE

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

low

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

Screenshot could not be taken.

Title:	Cliente Manager
Description:	Aplicación para gestión de clientes

IP Information

ip_address	35.219.200.23
country	US
network_name	Google LLC
asn	AS19527

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	- -
443/tcp	https	- -

Web Technologies

Software / Version	Category
Google Cloud	IaaS
Google Cloud CDN	CDN
Google Cloud Trace	Performance
HTTP/3	Miscellaneous
Lucide	Font scripts
Next.js 15.2.3	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
React	JavaScript frameworks
Webpack	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
Envoy	Reverse proxies

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

URL	Method	Parameters	Evidence
https://studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app/login	GET	Query: from=/ Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36	The following form sends inputs of type password plainly in the URL: ` Email Contraseña<input type="password" class="flex h-10 w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-base ring-offset-background file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm" placeholder="••••••••" id="«R2ifejb»-form-item" aria-describedby="«R2ifejb»-form-item-description" aria-invalid="false"... (truncated)

Vulnerability description

We found a form which is submitted using a GET method and has inputs of the type password. The end result is that passwords are submitted in URLs.

Risk description

Passwords submitted in URLs have a higher chance of being leaked. The main reason is that URLs can be leaked in browser cross-site requests via the Referer header. Additionally, URLs are usually stored in all kinds of logs. If any access or error logs of the server were publicly accessible, an attacker could also harvest password from it.

Recommendation

You should submit passwords using POST rather than GET. This way sensitive data won't be shared to other locations via URLs.

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app/login	Response headers do not include the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application lacks the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header in its responses. This security header is crucial as it instructs browsers to only establish secure (HTTPS) connections with the web server and reject any HTTP connections.

Risk description

The risk is that lack of this header permits an attacker to force a victim user to initiate a clear-text HTTP connection to the server, thus opening the possibility to eavesdrop on the network traffic and extract sensitive information (e.g. session cookies).

Recommendation

The Strict-Transport-Security HTTP header should be sent with each HTTPS response. The syntax is as follows: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=<seconds>[; includeSubDomains]` The parameter `max-age` gives the time frame for requirement of HTTPS in seconds and should be chosen quite high, e.g. several months. A value below 7776000 is considered as too low by this scanner check. The flag `includeSubDomains` defines that the policy applies also for sub domains of the sender of the response.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app/login	Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the `<meta/>` tag with name 'referrer' is not present in the response.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.

Risk description

The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.

Recommendation

The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Google Cloud	IaaS
Google Cloud CDN	CDN
Google Cloud Trace	Performance
HTTP/3	Miscellaneous
Lucide	Font scripts
Next.js 15.2.3	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
React	JavaScript frameworks
Webpack	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
Envoy	Reverse proxies

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app/login	Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.

Risk description

The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.

Recommendation

Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app/login	Response headers do not include the X-Content-Type-Options HTTP security header

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the X-Content-Type-Options header. This header is particularly important for preventing Internet Explorer from reinterpreting the content of a web page (MIME-sniffing) and thus overriding the value of the Content-Type header.

Risk description

The risk is that lack of this header could make possible attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting or phishing in Internet Explorer browsers.

Recommendation

We recommend setting the X-Content-Type-Options header such as `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app/login	<input type="email" class="flex h-10 w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-base ring-offset-background file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm" placeholder="tu@email.com" id="«R1ifejb»-form-item" aria-describedby="«R1ifejb»-form-item-description" aria-invalid="false" name="email" value=""> <input type="password" class="flex h-10 w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-base ring-offset-background file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm" placeholder="••••••••" id="«R2ifejb»-form-item" aria-describedby="«R2ifejb»-form-item-description" aria-invalid="false" name="password" value=""> <button class="inline-flex items-center justify-center gap-2 whitespace-nowrap rounded-md text-sm font-medium ring-offset-background transition-colors focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:pointer-events-none disabled:opacity-50 [&_svg]:pointer-events-none [&_svg]:size-4 [&_svg]:shrink-0 bg-primary text-primary-foreground hover:bg-primary/90 h-10 px-4 py-2 w-full" type="submit">Ing... (truncated)

https://studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app/login

<input type="email" class="flex h-10 w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-base ring-offset-background file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm" placeholder="tu@email.com" id="«R1ifejb»-form-item" aria-describedby="«R1ifejb»-form-item-description" aria-invalid="false" name="email" value=""> <input type="password" class="flex h-10 w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-base ring-offset-background file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm" placeholder="••••••••" id="«R2ifejb»-form-item" aria-describedby="«R2ifejb»-form-item-description" aria-invalid="false" name="password" value=""> <button class="inline-flex items-center justify-center gap-2 whitespace-nowrap rounded-md text-sm font-medium ring-offset-background transition-colors focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:pointer-events-none disabled:opacity-50 [&_svg]:pointer-events-none [&_svg]:size-4 [&_svg]:shrink-0 bg-primary text-primary-foreground hover:bg-primary/90 h-10 px-4 py-2 w-full" type="submit">Ing... (truncated)

Vulnerability description

We have discovered that the target application presents a login interface that could be a potential target for attacks. While login interfaces are standard for user authentication, they can become vulnerabilities if not properly secured.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this interface to mount brute force attacks against known passwords and usernames combinations leaked throughout the web.

Recommendation

Ensure each interface is not bypassable using common knowledge of the application or leaked credentials using occasional password audits.

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Next.js	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
Envoy	Reverse proxies
React	JavaScript frameworks
Google Cloud	IaaS
Google Cloud CDN	CDN
Webpack	Miscellaneous
HTTP/3	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
Lucide	Font scripts

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app	A	IPv4 address	35.219.200.23
studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app	NS	Name server	ns-cloud-d3.googledomains.com
studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app	NS	Name server	ns-cloud-d1.googledomains.com
studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app	NS	Name server	ns-cloud-d4.googledomains.com
studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app	NS	Name server	ns-cloud-d2.googledomains.com
studio--cliente-manager.us-central1.hosted.app	SOA	Start of Authority	ns-cloud-d1.googledomains.com. cloud-dns-hostmaster.google.com. 1 21600 3600 259200 300

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.