Vulnerability Scan Result
| Title: | Mi Vodafone |
| Description: | Accede a mi Vodafone y disfruta de los servicios y ventajas de Vodafone. Si no tienes usuario, hazlo en sólo dos pasos |
| ip_address | 45.60.76.192 |
| country | US  |
| network_name | Incapsula Inc |
| asn | AS19551 |
21/tcp | ftp | - - |
25/tcp | smtp | - - |
37/tcp | time | - - |
43/tcp | whois | - - |
53/tcp | domain | - - |
80/tcp | https | - - |
81/tcp | hosts2-ns | - - |
88/tcp | kerberos-sec | - - |
110/tcp | pop3 | - - |
119/tcp | nntp | - - |
135/tcp | msrpc | - - |
139/tcp | netbios-ssn | - - |
143/tcp | imap | - - |
389/tcp | ldap | - - |
443/tcp | https | - - |
444/tcp | snpp | - - |
465/tcp | smtps | - - |
514/tcp | shell | - - |
543/tcp | klogin | - - |
554/tcp | rtsp | - - |
587/tcp | submission | - - |
631/tcp | ipp | - - |
990/tcp | ftps | - - |
993/tcp | imaps | - - |
995/tcp | pop3s | - - |
1025/tcp | NFS-or-IIS | - - |
1028/tcp | other | - - |
1029/tcp | ms-lsa | - - |
1080/tcp | socks | - - |
1194/tcp | openvpn | - - |
1337/tcp | waste | - - |
1433/tcp | ms-sql-s | - - |
1701/tcp | l2f | - - |
1720/tcp | h323q931 | - - |
2000/tcp | cisco-sccp | - - |
2001/tcp | dc | - - |
2002/tcp | globe | - - |
2049/tcp | nfs | - - |
2078/tcp | tpcsrvr | - - |
2080/tcp | autodesk-nlm | - - |
2082/tcp | infowave | - - |
2083/tcp | radsec | - - |
2086/tcp | gnunet | - - |
2087/tcp | eli | - - |
2100/tcp | amiganetfs | - - |
2121/tcp | ccproxy-ftp | - - |
2222/tcp | EtherNetIP-1 | - - |
2967/tcp | symantec-av | - - |
3000/tcp | ppp | - - |
3050/tcp | gds_db | - - |
3306/tcp | mysql | - - |
3389/tcp | ms-wbt-server | - - |
3690/tcp | svn | - - |
4280/tcp | vrml-multi-use | - - |
4333/tcp | msql | - - |
4444/tcp | krb524 | - - |
4445/tcp | upnotifyp | - - |
5000/tcp | upnp | - - |
5004/tcp | avt-profile-1 | - - |
5005/tcp | avt-profile-2 | - - |
5009/tcp | airport-admin | - - |
5051/tcp | ida-agent | - - |
5060/tcp | sip | - - |
5222/tcp | xmpp-client | - - |
5223/tcp | hpvirtgrp | - - |
5631/tcp | pcanywheredata | - - |
5800/tcp | vnc-http | - - |
5900/tcp | vnc | - - |
5901/tcp | vnc-1 | - - |
5985/tcp | wsman | - - |
5986/tcp | wsmans | - - |
6000/tcp | X11 | - - |
6001/tcp | X11:1 | - - |
6379/tcp | redis | - - |
6699/tcp | napster | - - |
7000/tcp | afs3-fileserver | - - |
7001/tcp | afs3-callback | - - |
7070/tcp | realserver | - - |
8000/tcp | https | - - |
8008/tcp | https | - - |
8009/tcp | ajp13 | - - |
8080/tcp | https | - - |
8081/tcp | blackice-icecap | - - |
8200/tcp | trivnet1 | - - |
8222/tcp | other | - - |
8443/tcp | https-alt | - - |
8500/tcp | fmtp | - - |
8888/tcp | sun-answerbook | - - |
9000/tcp | cslistener | - - |
9042/tcp | other | - - |
9100/tcp | jetdirect | - - |
9800/tcp | davsrc | - - |
9999/tcp | abyss | - - |
10000/tcp | snet-sensor-mgmt | - - |
20000/tcp | dnp | - - |
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Angular 19.2.21 | JavaScript frameworks |
| Amazon Web Services | PaaS |
| Bootstrap | UI frameworks |
| Material Design Lite | UI frameworks |
| Zone.js | JavaScript frameworks |
| core-js 2.6.12 | JavaScript libraries |
| GSAP 1.20.3 | JavaScript frameworks |
| Hammer.js 2.0.7 | JavaScript libraries |
| Apache HTTP Server | Web servers |
| jQuery 3.5.1 | JavaScript libraries |
| PHP | Programming languages |
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| HSTS | Security |
| TypeScript | Programming languages |
Web Application Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| URL | Cookie Name | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| https://mvb.dxl.local.vodafone.es/ | incap_ses_608_3191001 | The server responded with Set-Cookie header(s) that does not specify the HttpOnly flag: Set-Cookie: incap_ses_608_3191001=ImhZKeEc6kpnmoueAQ1wCCAOMmoAAAAAzKOxNPOl+Viu5J41fJ/dPQ== |
Vulnerability description
We found that a cookie has been set without the HttpOnly flag, which means it can be accessed by potentially malicious JavaScript code running inside the web page. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker who injects malicious JavaScript code on the page (e.g. by using an XSS attack) can access the cookie and can send it to another site. In case of a session cookie, this could lead to session hijacking.
Recommendation
Ensure that the HttpOnly flag is set for all cookies.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-1004 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Cookie Name | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| https://mvb.dxl.local.vodafone.es/ | visid_incap_3191001 | Set-Cookie: .dxl.local.vodafone.es |
Vulnerability description
We found that the target application sets cookies with a domain scope that is too broad. Specifically, cookies intended for use within a particular application are configured in such a way that they can be accessed by multiple subdomains of the same primary domain.
Risk description
The risk is that a cookie set for example.com may be sent along with the requests sent to dev.example.com, calendar.example.com, hostedsite.example.com. Potentially risky websites under your main domain may access those cookies and use the victim session from the main site.
Recommendation
The `Domain` attribute should be set to the origin host to limit the scope to that particular server. For example if the application resides on server app.mysite.com, then it should be set to `Domain=app.mysite.com`
Classification
| CWE | CWE-614 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Angular 19.2.21 | JavaScript frameworks |
| Amazon Web Services | PaaS |
| Bootstrap | UI frameworks |
| Material Design Lite | UI frameworks |
| Zone.js | JavaScript frameworks |
| core-js 2.6.12 | JavaScript libraries |
| GSAP 1.20.3 | JavaScript frameworks |
| Hammer.js 2.0.7 | JavaScript libraries |
| Apache HTTP Server | Web servers |
| jQuery 3.5.1 | JavaScript libraries |
| PHP | Programming languages |
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| HSTS | Security |
| TypeScript | Programming languages |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-200 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://mvb.dxl.local.vodafone.es/ | Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues: |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header configured for the web application includes unsafe directives. The CSP header activates a protection mechanism implemented in web browsers which prevents exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities (XSS) by restricting the sources from which content can be loaded or executed.
Risk description
For example, if the unsafe-inline directive is present in the CSP header, the execution of inline scripts and event handlers is allowed. This can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the vulnerable application.
Recommendation
Remove the unsafe values from the directives, adopt nonces or hashes for safer inclusion of inline scripts if they are needed, and explicitly define the sources from which scripts, styles, images or other resources can be loaded.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-1021 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Method | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| https://mvb.dxl.local.vodafone.es/ | OPTIONS | We did a HTTP OPTIONS request. The server responded with a 200 status code and the header: `Allow: HEAD,GET,POST,OPTIONS` Request / Response |
Vulnerability description
We have noticed that the webserver responded with an Allow HTTP header when an OPTIONS HTTP request was sent. This method responds to requests by providing information about the methods available for the target resource.
Risk description
The only risk this might present nowadays is revealing debug HTTP methods that can be used on the server. This can present a danger if any of those methods can lead to sensitive information, like authentication information, secret keys.
Recommendation
We recommend that you check for unused HTTP methods or even better, disable the OPTIONS method. This can be done using your webserver configuration.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-16 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities
Evidence
We managed to detect a publicly accessible Virtual Network Computing (VNC) service. PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 5800/tcp open vnc-http
Vulnerability description
We found that the Virtual Network Computing (VNC) service is publicly accessible. VNC, widely used for remote desktop access, enables users to remotely view and interact with a computer's desktop environment. This capability makes it a prime target for attackers.
Risk description
The risk exists that by exploiting this service, an attacker could launch an authentication attack that can lead to unauthorized access and control over network resources.
Recommendation
We recommend turning off VNC access over the public Internet and instead using a Virtual Private Network (VPN) that mandates two-factor authentication (2FA). If the VNC service is essential for business purposes, limiting access to designated IP addresses is recommended.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Domain Queried | DNS Record Type | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| mvb.dxl.local.vodafone.es | A | IPv4 address | 45.60.76.192 |
| mvb.dxl.local.vodafone.es | CNAME | Canonical name | xbuwi4k.ng.impervadns.net |
Risk description
An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.
Recommendation
We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.
Evidence
| Operating System | Accuracy |
|---|---|
| Windows | 100% |
Vulnerability description
OS Detection
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| PHP | Programming languages |
| Amazon Web Services | PaaS |
| Apache HTTP Server | Web servers |
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| HSTS | Security |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Imperva | Security, CDN |
| Google Font API | Font scripts |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.