Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

http://srilaxmienterprises.co.in/ (redirect)

Scanned target: https://www.srilaxmienterprises.co.in/

Submitted: Feb 17, 2026 from GD

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

medium

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

Screenshot could not be taken.

Title:	Sri Laxmi Enterprises - Service Provider of Coffee Premix & Tea Premix from Secunderabad
Description:	Coffee Premix, Tea Premix & Dairy Whitener Service Provider offered by Sri Laxmi Enterprises from Secunderabad, Telangana, India

IP Information

ip_address	34.66.135.39
country	US
network_name	Google LLC
asn	AS396982

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	Apache httpd -
443/tcp	https	- -

Web Technologies

Software / Version	Category
Bootstrap	UI frameworks
Google Analytics GA4	Analytics
Google Font API	Font scripts
jQuery 3.7.1	JavaScript libraries
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
HSTS	Security

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

URL	Cookie Name	Evidence
https://www.srilaxmienterprises.co.in/	iploc	Set-Cookie: .srilaxmienterprises.co.in

Vulnerability description

We found that the target application sets cookies with a domain scope that is too broad. Specifically, cookies intended for use within a particular application are configured in such a way that they can be accessed by multiple subdomains of the same primary domain.

Risk description

The risk is that a cookie set for example.com may be sent along with the requests sent to dev.example.com, calendar.example.com, hostedsite.example.com. Potentially risky websites under your main domain may access those cookies and use the victim session from the main site.

Recommendation

The `Domain` attribute should be set to the origin host to limit the scope to that particular server. For example if the application resides on server app.mysite.com, then it should be set to `Domain=app.mysite.com`

Classification

CWE	CWE-614
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Cookie Name	Evidence
https://www.srilaxmienterprises.co.in/	iploc	Set-Cookie: iploc=gcniso%3DUK%7Cgcnnm%3DUnited%20Kingdom%7Cgacrcy%3D20%7Cgip%3D172.236.25.65%7Cgcode%3D%2B44

Vulnerability description

We found that a cookie has been set without the Secure flag, which means the browser will send it over an unencrypted channel (plain HTTP) if such a request is made. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.

Risk description

The risk exists that an attacker will intercept the clear-text communication between the browser and the server and he will steal the cookie of the user. If this is a session cookie, the attacker could gain unauthorized access to the victim's web session.

Recommendation

Whenever a cookie contains sensitive information or is a session token, then it should always be passed using an encrypted channel. Ensure that the secure flag is set for cookies containing such sensitive information.

Classification

CWE	CWE-614
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Cookie Name	Evidence
https://www.srilaxmienterprises.co.in/	iploc	The server responded with Set-Cookie header(s) that does not specify the HttpOnly flag: Set-Cookie: iploc=gcniso%3DUK%7Cgcnnm%3DUnited%20Kingdom%7Cgacrcy%3D20%7Cgip%3D172.236.25.65%7Cgcode%3D%2B44

Vulnerability description

We found that a cookie has been set without the HttpOnly flag, which means it can be accessed by potentially malicious JavaScript code running inside the web page. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker who injects malicious JavaScript code on the page (e.g. by using an XSS attack) can access the cookie and can send it to another site. In case of a session cookie, this could lead to session hijacking.

Recommendation

Ensure that the HttpOnly flag is set for all cookies.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1004
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.srilaxmienterprises.co.in/	Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:default-src: data: URI in default-src allows the execution of unsafe scripts. default-src: 'self' can be problematic if you host JSONP, Angular or user uploaded files. script-src: 'unsafe-eval' allows the execution of code injected into DOM APIs such as eval(). base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. script-src: ''unsafe-inline'' allows the execution of unsafe in-page scripts and event handlers. object-src: We recommend restricting object-src to 'none'.

https://www.srilaxmienterprises.co.in/

Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:default-src: data: URI in default-src allows the execution of unsafe scripts. default-src: 'self' can be problematic if you host JSONP, Angular or user uploaded files. script-src: 'unsafe-eval' allows the execution of code injected into DOM APIs such as eval(). base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. script-src: ''unsafe-inline'' allows the execution of unsafe in-page scripts and event handlers. object-src: We recommend restricting object-src to 'none'.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header configured for the web application includes unsafe directives. The CSP header activates a protection mechanism implemented in web browsers which prevents exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities (XSS) by restricting the sources from which content can be loaded or executed.

Risk description

For example, if the unsafe-inline directive is present in the CSP header, the execution of inline scripts and event handlers is allowed. This can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the vulnerable application.

Recommendation

Remove the unsafe values from the directives, adopt nonces or hashes for safer inclusion of inline scripts if they are needed, and explicitly define the sources from which scripts, styles, images or other resources can be loaded.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
https://www.srilaxmienterprises.co.in/robots.txt

Vulnerability description

We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.

Risk description

There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.

Recommendation

We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Bootstrap	UI frameworks
Google Analytics GA4	Analytics
Google Font API	Font scripts
jQuery 3.7.1	JavaScript libraries
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
HSTS	Security

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

URL
Missing: https://www.srilaxmienterprises.co.in/.well-known/security.txt

Vulnerability description

We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.

Risk description

There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.

Recommendation

We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Operating System	Accuracy
Crestron XPanel control system	90%

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Google Analytics	Analytics
HSTS	Security

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
www.srilaxmienterprises.co.in	A	IPv4 address	34.66.135.39

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.