Vulnerability Scan Result
| Title: | Здравсити - интернет-аптека, поиск лекарств онлайн, купить с доставкой в аптеку или на дом в Москве |
| Description: | Онлайн-аптека Здравсити удобный поиск лекарств и товаров для здоровья с доставкой в ближайшую к вам аптеку Большой ассортимент более 30 000 препаратов Доставка в кратчайшие сроки! |
| ip_address | 185.178.208.215 |
| country | RU  |
| network_name | Ddos-Guard Ltd |
| asn | AS57724 |
No open ports were found.
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| DDoS-Guard | Security |
| Yandex.Metrika | Analytics |
| Mindbox | Marketing automation |
| MobX | JavaScript libraries |
| Next.js 15.5.0 | JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator |
| PHP | Programming languages |
| React | JavaScript frameworks |
| Sentry | Issue trackers |
| PWA | Miscellaneous |
| Webpack | Miscellaneous |
| 1C-Bitrix | CMS, Ecommerce |
| HSTS | Security |
| Cart Functionality | Ecommerce |
Web Application Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| CVE | CVSS | EPSS Score | EPSS Percentile | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-55182 | 10 | 0.99562 | 0.99941 | A pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability exists in React Server Components versions 19.0.0, 19.1.0, 19.1.1, and 19.2.0 including the following packages: react-server-dom-parcel, react-server-dom-turbopack, and react-server-dom-webpack. The vulnerable code unsafely deserializes payloads from HTTP requests to Server Function endpoints. |
| CVE-2026-44578 | 8.6 | 0.37756 | 0.98352 | Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 13.4.13 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, self-hosted applications using the built-in Node.js server can be vulnerable to server-side request forgery through crafted WebSocket upgrade requests. An attacker can cause the server to proxy requests to arbitrary internal or external destinations, which may expose internal services or cloud metadata endpoints. Vercel-hosted deployments are not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5. |
| CVE-2026-44574 | 8.1 | 0.00383 | 0.3013 | Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 15.4.0 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, applications that rely on middleware to protect dynamic routes can be vulnerable to authorization bypass. In affected deployments, specially crafted query parameters can alter the dynamic route value seen by the page while leaving the visible path unchanged, which can allow protected content to be rendered without passing the expected middleware check. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5. |
| CVE-2026-45109 | 7.5 | 0.00386 | 0.30415 | Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 15.2.0 to before 15.5.18 and 16.2.6, it was found that the fix addressing CVE-2026-44575 did not apply to middleware.ts with Turbopack. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.18 and 16.2.6. |
| CVE-2026-44579 | 7.5 | 0.00461 | 0.36657 | Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, applications using Partial Prerendering through the Cache Components feature can be vulnerable to connection exhaustion through crafted POST requests to a server action. In affected configurations, a malicious request can trigger a request-body handling deadlock that leaves connections open for an extended period, consuming file descriptors and server capacity until legitimate users are denied service. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5. |
Vulnerability description
Outdated or vulnerable software components include versions of server-side software that are no longer supported or have known, publicly disclosed vulnerabilities. Using outdated software significantly increases the attack surface of a system and may allow unauthorized access, data leaks, or service disruptions. Vulnerabilities in these components are often well-documented and actively exploited by attackers. Without security patches or vendor support, any weaknesses remain unmitigated, exposing the application to risks. In some cases, even after patching, the reported version may remain unchanged, requiring manual verification.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could search for an appropriate exploit (or create one himself) for any of these vulnerabilities and use it to attack the system. Since the vulnerabilities were discovered using only version-based testing, the risk level for this finding will not exceed 'high' severity. Critical risks will be assigned to vulnerabilities identified through accurate active testing methods.
Recommendation
In order to eliminate the risk of these vulnerabilities, we recommend you check the installed software version and upgrade to the latest version.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-1035 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Cookie Name | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| https://zdravcity.ru/ | zc_session_token, PHPSESSID, zc_v4_region, BITRIX_SM_LAST_REG_CODE | Set-Cookie: zc_session_token=6edb4d62-c724-48d3-8a76-5408915b14d6 Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=S2hNGnJg2Mik925ojcgVfCYRKCbFBlIp Set-Cookie: zc_v4_region=%7B%22id%22%3A%22moscowregion%22%2C%22lat%22%3A%2255.7522%22%2C%22long%22%3A%2237.6156%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B0%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C%22%2C%22num%22%3A%2277%22%2C%22names%22%3A%7B%22i%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B0%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C%22%2C%22r%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%8B%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%22%2C%22p%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B5%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%22%7D%2C%22cityNames%22%3A%7B%22i%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B0%22%2C%22r%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%8B%22%2C%22p%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B5%22%7D%7D Set-Cookie: BITRIX_SM_LAST_REG_CODE=moscowregion |
Vulnerability description
We found that a cookie has been set without the Secure flag, which means the browser will send it over an unencrypted channel (plain HTTP) if such a request is made. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.
Risk description
The risk exists that an attacker will intercept the clear-text communication between the browser and the server and he will steal the cookie of the user. If this is a session cookie, the attacker could gain unauthorized access to the victim's web session.
Recommendation
Whenever a cookie contains sensitive information or is a session token, then it should always be passed using an encrypted channel. Ensure that the secure flag is set for cookies containing such sensitive information.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-614 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Cookie Name | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| https://zdravcity.ru/ | zc_v4_region, BITRIX_SM_LAST_REG_CODE | The server responded with Set-Cookie header(s) that does not specify the HttpOnly flag: Set-Cookie: zc_v4_region=%7B%22id%22%3A%22moscowregion%22%2C%22lat%22%3A%2255.7522%22%2C%22long%22%3A%2237.6156%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B0%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C%22%2C%22num%22%3A%2277%22%2C%22names%22%3A%7B%22i%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B0%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C%22%2C%22r%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%8B%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%22%2C%22p%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B5%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%22%7D%2C%22cityNames%22%3A%7B%22i%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B0%22%2C%22r%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%8B%22%2C%22p%22%3A%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B5%22%7D%7D Set-Cookie: BITRIX_SM_LAST_REG_CODE=moscowregion |
Vulnerability description
We found that a cookie has been set without the HttpOnly flag, which means it can be accessed by potentially malicious JavaScript code running inside the web page. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker who injects malicious JavaScript code on the page (e.g. by using an XSS attack) can access the cookie and can send it to another site. In case of a session cookie, this could lead to session hijacking.
Recommendation
Ensure that the HttpOnly flag is set for all cookies.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-1004 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Cookie Name | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| https://zdravcity.ru/ | zc_session_token | Set-Cookie: .zdravcity.ru |
Vulnerability description
We found that the target application sets cookies with a domain scope that is too broad. Specifically, cookies intended for use within a particular application are configured in such a way that they can be accessed by multiple subdomains of the same primary domain.
Risk description
The risk is that a cookie set for example.com may be sent along with the requests sent to dev.example.com, calendar.example.com, hostedsite.example.com. Potentially risky websites under your main domain may access those cookies and use the victim session from the main site.
Recommendation
The `Domain` attribute should be set to the origin host to limit the scope to that particular server. For example if the application resides on server app.mysite.com, then it should be set to `Domain=app.mysite.com`
Classification
| CWE | CWE-614 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
Vulnerability description
We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.
Risk description
There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.
Recommendation
We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| DDoS-Guard | Security |
| Yandex.Metrika | Analytics |
| Mindbox | Marketing automation |
| MobX | JavaScript libraries |
| Next.js 15.5.0 | JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator |
| PHP | Programming languages |
| React | JavaScript frameworks |
| Sentry | Issue trackers |
| PWA | Miscellaneous |
| Webpack | Miscellaneous |
| 1C-Bitrix | CMS, Ecommerce |
| HSTS | Security |
| Cart Functionality | Ecommerce |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-200 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://zdravcity.ru/ | Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.
Risk description
The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.
Recommendation
Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-1021 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://zdravcity.ru/ | Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.
Risk description
The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.
Recommendation
The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-693 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://zdravcity.ru/ | Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues: |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header configured for the web application includes unsafe directives. The CSP header activates a protection mechanism implemented in web browsers which prevents exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities (XSS) by restricting the sources from which content can be loaded or executed.
Risk description
For example, if the unsafe-inline directive is present in the CSP header, the execution of inline scripts and event handlers is allowed. This can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the vulnerable application.
Recommendation
Remove the unsafe values from the directives, adopt nonces or hashes for safer inclusion of inline scripts if they are needed, and explicitly define the sources from which scripts, styles, images or other resources can be loaded.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-1021 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://zdravcity.ru/ | Response headers do not include the X-Content-Type-Options HTTP security header |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the X-Content-Type-Options header. This header is particularly important for preventing Internet Explorer from reinterpreting the content of a web page (MIME-sniffing) and thus overriding the value of the Content-Type header.
Risk description
The risk is that lack of this header could make possible attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting or phishing in Internet Explorer browsers.
Recommendation
We recommend setting the X-Content-Type-Options header such as `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-693 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Vulnerability description
We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.
Risk description
There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.
Recommendation
We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-1188 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Method | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| https://zdravcity.ru/ | OPTIONS | We did a HTTP OPTIONS request. The server responded with a 200 status code and the header: `Allow: GET,HEAD` Request / Response |
Vulnerability description
We have noticed that the webserver responded with an Allow HTTP header when an OPTIONS HTTP request was sent. This method responds to requests by providing information about the methods available for the target resource.
Risk description
The only risk this might present nowadays is revealing debug HTTP methods that can be used on the server. This can present a danger if any of those methods can lead to sensitive information, like authentication information, secret keys.
Recommendation
We recommend that you check for unused HTTP methods or even better, disable the OPTIONS method. This can be done using your webserver configuration.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-16 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| Domain Queried | DNS Record Type | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| zdravcity.ru | A | IPv4 address | 185.178.208.215 |
| zdravcity.ru | NS | Name server | ns1.yandexcloud.net |
| zdravcity.ru | NS | Name server | ns2.yandexcloud.net |
| zdravcity.ru | MX | Mail server | 10 mx.yandex.net |
| zdravcity.ru | SOA | Start of Authority | ns1.yandexcloud.net. mx.cloud.yandex.net. 1 10800 900 604800 900 |
| zdravcity.ru | TXT | Text record | "google-site-verification=cvVbI9x6U_adT9QaNGObesSCZFyMeq9v6NXODSohW1Q" |
| zdravcity.ru | TXT | Text record | "mindbox:bec11580-ada6-40b4-bb43-a2d4d3e92dc6" |
| zdravcity.ru | TXT | Text record | "yandex-verification: 3bab214b788c1944" |
| zdravcity.ru | TXT | Text record | "google-site-verification=ExrBQ1m-cOV2Saz7gR9IWPXrrRNyEr8Vf4Vtxeh1Z6M" |
| zdravcity.ru | TXT | Text record | "yandex-verification: 0c237a4cd0e15bd3" |
| zdravcity.ru | TXT | Text record | "yandex-verification: c2e6ebb4153bd8e3" |
| zdravcity.ru | TXT | Text record | "google-site-verification=xt73aw_ReB6q6_i93OPPKz-uh1bWK0AiEjd30FJHo3Y" |
| zdravcity.ru | TXT | Text record | "_globalsign-domain-verification=N2wZfna5jpNKAEEgIlT1ABaTzxNh7EWCwy8huymj5-" |
| zdravcity.ru | TXT | Text record | "google-site-verification=Ze5qRZ4ZlkJe33CP1FvB0iKa-tvTFMuv7aLUgJRltKY" |
| zdravcity.ru | SPF | Sender Policy Framework | "v=spf1 ip4:84.201.191.4 include:spf.mindbox.ru include:_spf.yandex.net ip4:194.146.119.0/24 ~all" |
| _dmarc.zdravcity.ru | TXT | Text record | "v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc-reports@zdravcity.ru" |
Risk description
An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.
Recommendation
We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.