Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

https://sitarose97.tumblr.com/

Scanned target: https://sitarose97.tumblr.com/

Submitted: May 02, 2026 from PG

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

high

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

Title:	Like No One is Watching
Description:	Just an average girl who enjoys music and theatre, as well as pop culture and video games.

IP Information

ip_address	74.114.154.18
country	US
network_name	Automattic, Inc.
asn	AS2635

ip_address	74.114.154.22
country	US
network_name	Automattic, Inc.
asn	AS2635

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	nginx -
443/tcp	https	nginx -

Web Technologies

Software / Version	Category
Backbone.js 1.3.3	JavaScript frameworks
Google Publisher Tag	Advertising
MySQL	Databases
Nginx	Web servers, Reverse proxies
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
PHP	Programming languages
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
Underscore.js	JavaScript libraries
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
Lodash 3.10.1	JavaScript libraries
HSTS	Security
RSS	Miscellaneous
Tumblr	Blogs

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

CVE	CVSS	EPSS Score	EPSS Percentile	Summary
CVE-2019-10744	9.1	0.03341	0.87348	Versions of lodash lower than 4.17.12 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The function defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload.
CVE-2020-8203	7.4	0.03306	0.8729	Prototype pollution attack when using _.zipObjectDeep in lodash before 4.17.20.
CVE-2021-23337	7.2	0.04314	0.88935	Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function.
CVE-2019-1010266	6.5	0.00217	0.44117	lodash prior to 4.17.11 is affected by: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: Date handler. The attack vector is: Attacker provides very long strings, which the library attempts to match using a regular expression. The fixed version is: 4.17.11.
CVE-2018-3721	6.5	0.00256	0.489	lodash node module before 4.17.5 suffers from a Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID) vulnerability via defaultsDeep, merge, and mergeWith functions, which allows a malicious user to modify the prototype of "Object" via __proto__, causing the addition or modification of an existing property that will exist on all objects.

Vulnerability description

Outdated or vulnerable software components include versions of server-side software that are no longer supported or have known, publicly disclosed vulnerabilities. Using outdated software significantly increases the attack surface of a system and may allow unauthorized access, data leaks, or service disruptions. Vulnerabilities in these components are often well-documented and actively exploited by attackers. Without security patches or vendor support, any weaknesses remain unmitigated, exposing the application to risks. In some cases, even after patching, the reported version may remain unchanged, requiring manual verification.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could search for an appropriate exploit (or create one himself) for any of these vulnerabilities and use it to attack the system. Since the vulnerabilities were discovered using only version-based testing, the risk level for this finding will not exceed 'high' severity. Critical risks will be assigned to vulnerabilities identified through accurate active testing methods.

Recommendation

In order to eliminate the risk of these vulnerabilities, we recommend you check the installed software version and upgrade to the latest version.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1035
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
https://sitarose97.tumblr.com/crossdomain.xml

Vulnerability description

We have noticed that the target application has overly permissive settings in its client access policy files. The crossdomain.xml file controls the access of externally hosted Flash scripts to this website, while clientaccesspolicy.xml specifies other sites that can read content from this website - which is normally denied by the Same Origin Policy. This vulnerability arises from configurations that grant excessive permissions to clients.

Risk description

In `crossdomain.xml`, the external websites which are permitted to read content from this website via Flash are specified in the XML tag `<allow-access-from>`. If the value of this tag is too permissive (ex. wildcard), it means that any Flash script from an external website could access content from this website, including confidential information of users. If the allowed domains are too permissive (ex. wildcard) in `clientaccesspolicy.xml`, then any external website will be able to read content (including sensitive information) from this website. Flash is not supported anymore and this poses a risk only if the user's clients use older browsers, making them vulnerable to their information being accessed by a malicious external Flash script.

Recommendation

We recommend to carefully review the content of the policy file and permit access only for legitimate domains.

Classification

CWE	CWE-942
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Method	Parameters	Evidence
https://sitarose97.tumblr.com/post/176005557099/	GET	Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36	Credit Card Number: 650619257443549184

Vulnerability description

We noticed that this application does not properly prevent a person's private, personal information from being accessed by actors who either (1) are not explicitly authorized to access the information or (2) do not have the implicit consent of the person about whom the information is collected. Sensitive data targeted usually consists of emails, credit card and social security numbers.

Risk description

The risk exists that sensitive personal information within the application could be accessed by unauthorized parties. This could lead to privacy violations, identity theft, or other forms of personal or corporate harm.

Recommendation

Compartmentalize the application to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.

Classification

CWE	CWE-201
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
https://sitarose97.tumblr.com/robots.txt

Vulnerability description

We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.

Risk description

There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.

Recommendation

We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).

Evidence

URL Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://sitarose97.tumblr.com/image/	Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:`report-uri: report-uri is deprecated in CSP3. Please use the report-to directive instead. default-src: The default-src directive should be set as a fall-back when other restrictions have not been specified. script-src: 'self' can be problematic if you host JSONP, Angular or user uploaded files. script-src: ''unsafe-inline'' allows the execution of unsafe in-page scripts and event handlers. script-src: 'unsafe-eval' allows the execution of code injected into DOM APIs such as eval().`

https://sitarose97.tumblr.com/image/

Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:report-uri: report-uri is deprecated in CSP3. Please use the report-to directive instead. default-src: The default-src directive should be set as a fall-back when other restrictions have not been specified. script-src: 'self' can be problematic if you host JSONP, Angular or user uploaded files. script-src: ''unsafe-inline'' allows the execution of unsafe in-page scripts and event handlers. script-src: 'unsafe-eval' allows the execution of code injected into DOM APIs such as eval().

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header configured for the web application includes unsafe directives. The CSP header activates a protection mechanism implemented in web browsers which prevents exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities (XSS) by restricting the sources from which content can be loaded or executed.

Risk description

For example, if the unsafe-inline directive is present in the CSP header, the execution of inline scripts and event handlers is allowed. This can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the vulnerable application.

Recommendation

Remove the unsafe values from the directives, adopt nonces or hashes for safer inclusion of inline scripts if they are needed, and explicitly define the sources from which scripts, styles, images or other resources can be loaded.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1021
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Backbone.js 1.3.3	JavaScript frameworks
Google Publisher Tag	Advertising
MySQL	Databases
Nginx	Web servers, Reverse proxies
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
PHP	Programming languages
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
Underscore.js	JavaScript libraries
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
Lodash 3.10.1	JavaScript libraries
HSTS	Security
RSS	Miscellaneous
Tumblr	Blogs

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Classification

CWE	CWE-200
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://sitarose97.tumblr.com/	Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the `<meta/>` tag with name 'referrer' is not present in the response.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.

Risk description

The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.

Recommendation

The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://sitarose97.tumblr.com/image/	Response headers do not include the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application lacks the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header in its responses. This security header is crucial as it instructs browsers to only establish secure (HTTPS) connections with the web server and reject any HTTP connections.

Risk description

The risk is that lack of this header permits an attacker to force a victim user to initiate a clear-text HTTP connection to the server, thus opening the possibility to eavesdrop on the network traffic and extract sensitive information (e.g. session cookies).

Recommendation

The Strict-Transport-Security HTTP header should be sent with each HTTPS response. The syntax is as follows: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=<seconds>[; includeSubDomains]` The parameter `max-age` gives the time frame for requirement of HTTPS in seconds and should be chosen quite high, e.g. several months. A value below 7776000 is considered as too low by this scanner check. The flag `includeSubDomains` defines that the policy applies also for sub domains of the sender of the response.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://sitarose97.tumblr.com/	Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.

Risk description

The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.

Recommendation

Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1021
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Method	Parameters	Evidence
https://sitarose97.tumblr.com/	GET	Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36	Suspicious comment bug found in: `console 2. Run` googletag.openConsole() `3. GAM debug UI should appear and tell some more info on the a`

Vulnerability description

We have discovered that the target application's code contains suspicious comments that may be related to potential bugs, incomplete functionality, or weaknesses. These comments often arise during development and testing phases but are inadvertently left in the code.

Risk description

The risk exists that attackers could analyze these comments to identify vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the application. While comments themselves do not directly lead to security breaches, they may guide attackers to focus their efforts on specific parts of the application, potentially uncovering and exploiting vulnerabilities.

Recommendation

Remove comments that suggest the presence of bugs, incomplete functionality, or weaknesses, before deploying the application.

Classification

CWE	CWE-546
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
sitarose97.tumblr.com	A	IPv4 address	74.114.154.18
sitarose97.tumblr.com	A	IPv4 address	74.114.154.22
sitarose97.tumblr.com	SPF	Sender Policy Framework	"v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.automattic.com include:sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com -all"

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
Tumblr	Blogs
MySQL	Databases
PHP	Programming languages
Nginx	Web servers, Reverse proxies
Google Publisher Tag	Advertising
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
HSTS	Security

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.