Vulnerability Scan Result

| Title: | zephyrdill67的个人资料 - 九神28论坛-幸运28论坛社区 - Powered by Discuz! |
| Description: | zephyrdill67的个人资料 ,九神28论坛-幸运28论坛社区 |
| ip_address | 208.109.36.173 |
| country | US |
| network_name | GoDaddy.com, LLC |
| asn | AS398101 |
21/tcp | ftp | Pure-FTPd - |
22/tcp | ssh | OpenSSH 7.4 |
80/tcp | http | nginx - |
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Nginx | Web servers, Reverse proxies |
| PHP | Programming languages |
| Discuz! X 3.4 | Message boards |
Web Application Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| URL | Cookie Name | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| http://jslt28.com/home.php | DCE3_2132_saltkey, DCE3_2132_lastvisit, DCE3_2132_sid, DCE3_2132_lastact, DCE3_2132_home_diymode | Set-Cookie: DCE3_2132_saltkey=G865qQ7p Set-Cookie: DCE3_2132_lastvisit=1771195919 Set-Cookie: DCE3_2132_sid=H9drv3 Set-Cookie: DCE3_2132_lastact=1771199519%09home.php%09space Set-Cookie: DCE3_2132_home_diymode=1 |
Vulnerability description
We found that a cookie has been set without the Secure flag, which means the browser will send it over an unencrypted channel (plain HTTP) if such a request is made. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.
Risk description
The risk exists that an attacker will intercept the clear-text communication between the browser and the server and he will steal the cookie of the user. If this is a session cookie, the attacker could gain unauthorized access to the victim's web session.
Recommendation
Whenever a cookie contains sensitive information or is a session token, then it should always be passed using an encrypted channel. Ensure that the secure flag is set for cookies containing such sensitive information.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-614 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Response URL | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| http://jslt28.com/home.php | http://jslt28.com/home.php?uid=2982848&mod=space | Communication is made over unsecure, unencrypted HTTP. |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the communication between the web browser and the server is done using the HTTP protocol, which transmits data unencrypted over the network.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker who manages to intercept the communication at the network level can read and modify the data transmitted (including passwords, secret tokens, credit card information and other sensitive data).
Recommendation
We recommend you to reconfigure the web server to use HTTPS - which encrypts the communication between the web browser and the server.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-311 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Cookie Name | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| http://jslt28.com/home.php | DCE3_2132_lastvisit, DCE3_2132_sid, DCE3_2132_lastact, DCE3_2132_home_diymode | The server responded with Set-Cookie header(s) that does not specify the HttpOnly flag: Set-Cookie: DCE3_2132_lastvisit=1771195919 Set-Cookie: DCE3_2132_sid=H9drv3 Set-Cookie: DCE3_2132_lastact=1771199519%09home.php%09space Set-Cookie: DCE3_2132_home_diymode=1 |
Vulnerability description
We found that a cookie has been set without the HttpOnly flag, which means it can be accessed by potentially malicious JavaScript code running inside the web page. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker who injects malicious JavaScript code on the page (e.g. by using an XSS attack) can access the cookie and can send it to another site. In case of a session cookie, this could lead to session hijacking.
Recommendation
Ensure that the HttpOnly flag is set for all cookies.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-1004 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
Vulnerability description
We have noticed that the target application has overly permissive settings in its client access policy files. The crossdomain.xml file controls the access of externally hosted Flash scripts to this website, while clientaccesspolicy.xml specifies other sites that can read content from this website - which is normally denied by the Same Origin Policy. This vulnerability arises from configurations that grant excessive permissions to clients.
Risk description
In `crossdomain.xml`, the external websites which are permitted to read content from this website via Flash are specified in the XML tag `<allow-access-from>`. If the value of this tag is too permissive (ex. wildcard), it means that any Flash script from an external website could access content from this website, including confidential information of users. If the allowed domains are too permissive (ex. wildcard) in `clientaccesspolicy.xml`, then any external website will be able to read content (including sensitive information) from this website. Flash is not supported anymore and this poses a risk only if the user's clients use older browsers, making them vulnerable to their information being accessed by a malicious external Flash script.
Recommendation
We recommend to carefully review the content of the policy file and permit access only for legitimate domains.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-16 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Evidence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| http://jslt28.com/home.php | Password input detected over insecure HTTP. Login form: ` Evidence
Vulnerability description We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Risk description The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking. Recommendation The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely. Classification
Evidence Vulnerability description We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users. Risk description There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone. Recommendation We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc). Evidence
Vulnerability description We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions. Risk description The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version. Recommendation We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc. Evidence
Vulnerability description We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Risk description The risk is that lack of this header could make possible attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting or phishing in Internet Explorer browsers. Recommendation We recommend setting the X-Content-Type-Options header such as `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`. Classification
Evidence
Vulnerability description We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. Risk description The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers. Recommendation Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application. Classification
Evidence Vulnerability description We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures. Risk description There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues. Recommendation We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server. Evidence
Vulnerability description We have discovered that the target application presents a login interface that could be a potential target for attacks. While login interfaces are standard for user authentication, they can become vulnerabilities if not properly secured. Risk description The risk is that an attacker could use this interface to mount brute force attacks against known passwords and usernames combinations leaked throughout the web. Recommendation Ensure each interface is not bypassable using common knowledge of the application or leaked credentials using occasional password audits. Infrastructure VulnerabilitiesEvidence
Vulnerability description Vulnerabilities found for Openssh 7.4 Risk description These vulnerabilities expose the affected applications to the risk of unauthorized access to confidential data and possibly to denial of service attacks. An attacker could search for an appropriate exploit (or create one) for any of these vulnerabilities and use it to attack the system. Notes: - The vulnerabilities are identified based on the server's version.; - Only the first 5 vulnerabilities with the highest risk are shown for each port.; Since the vulnerabilities were discovered using only version-based testing, the risk level for this finding will not exceed "high" severity. Critical risks will be assigned to vulnerabilities identified through accurate active testing methods. Recommendation We recommend you to upgrade the affected software to the latest version in order to eliminate the risks imposed by these vulnerabilities. Evidence We managed to detect a publicly accessible SSH service. Starting Nmap ( https://nmap.org ) at 2026-02-16 01:52 EET Nmap scan report for jslt28.com (208.109.36.173) Host is up (0.14s latency). rDNS record for 208.109.36.173: 173.36.109.208.host.secureserver.net PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 7.4 (protocol 2.0) | ssh-auth-methods: | Supported authentication methods: | publickey | gssapi-keyex | gssapi-with-mic |_ password Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at https://nmap.org/submit/ . Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.23 seconds Vulnerability description We found that the SSH service with username/password authentication is publicly accessible. Network administrators often use remote administration protocols to control devices like switches, routers, and other essential systems. However, allowing these services to be accessible via the Internet can increase security risks, creating potential opportunities for attacks on the organization. Risk description Exposing this service online with username/password authentication can enable attackers to launch authentication attacks, like guessing login credentials, and potentially gaining unauthorized access. Vulnerabilities, such as unpatched software, protocol flaws, or backdoors could also be exploited. An example is the CVE-2024-3094 (XZ Utils Backdoor) vulnerability. Recommendation We recommend turning off SSH with username/password authentication access over the Internet and instead using a Virtual Private Network (VPN) that mandates two-factor authentication (2FA). If the SSH service is essential for business purposes, we recommend limiting access only from designated IP addresses using a firewall. Furthermore, it is advisable to utilize SSH Public Key Authentication since it employs a key pair to verify the identity of a user or process. Evidence We managed to detect a publicly accessible File Transfer Protocol (FTP) service. PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 21/tcp open ftp Pure-FTPd Vulnerability description We found that the File Transfer Protocol (FTP) service is publicly accessible. The FTP enables client systems to connect to upload and download files. Nonetheless, FTP lacks encryption for the data exchanged between the server and the client, leaving all transferred data exposed in plaintext. Risk description Exposing this service online can enable attackers to execute man-in-the-middle attacks, capturing sensitive user credentials and the contents of files because FTP operates without encryption. The entirety of the communication between the client and the server remains unsecured in plaintext. This acquired information could further facilitate additional attacks within the network. Recommendation We recommend turning off FTP access over the Internet and instead using a Virtual Private Network (VPN) that mandates two-factor authentication (2FA). If the FTP service is essential for business purposes, we recommend limiting access only from designated IP addresses using a firewall. Furthermore, utilizing SFTP (Secure File Transfer Protocol) is recommended as this protocol employs encryption to secure data transfers. Evidence We found insecure DNS cookie usage on the following nameservers: ns1.dns.com, ns2.dns.com Vulnerability description We found that the server does not implement DNS Cookies or uses them insecurely. DNS Cookies help prevent DNS-based attacks, such as spoofing and amplification attacks. Risk description The risk exists because without DNS Cookies, the server is vulnerable to DNS spoofing and amplification attacks. Attackers can manipulate responses or use the server in distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, compromising network availability and security. Recommendation We recommend enabling DNS Cookies to prevent spoofed DNS responses. Ensure proper cookie validation is implemented to mitigate DNS amplification attacks. Regularly update DNS servers to support the latest DNS security features. Evidence
Vulnerability description OS Detection Evidence
Vulnerability description We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions. Risk description The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version. Recommendation We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc. Evidence
Risk description An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network. Recommendation We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records. |
