Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

https://itagprotracker.com/ (redirect)

Scanned target: https://www.itagprotracker.com/

Submitted: Jun 13, 2026 from TV

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

low

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

Screenshot could not be taken.

Title:	iTagPro: Smart Tracking for Keys, Bags, Pets & More
Description:	iTagPro is the compact, smart GPS tracker that keeps your valuables safe, easy to locate, and protected from theft or loss.

IP Information

ip_address	172.67.157.18
country	-
network_name	Cloudflare, Inc.
asn	AS13335

ip_address	104.21.34.80
country	-
network_name	Cloudflare, Inc.
asn	AS13335

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	Cloudflare http proxy -
443/tcp	https	cloudflare -
2082/tcp	http	Cloudflare http proxy -
2083/tcp	https	nginx -
2086/tcp	http	Cloudflare http proxy -
2087/tcp	https	nginx -
8080/tcp	http	Cloudflare http proxy -
8443/tcp	https-alt	cloudflare -

Web Technologies

Software / Version	Category
Clipboard.js	JavaScript libraries
jQuery CDN	CDN
jQuery Migrate 3.4.1	JavaScript libraries
Google Analytics	Analytics
HTTP/3	Miscellaneous
jQuery 3.6.0	JavaScript libraries
MySQL	Databases
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
PHP	Programming languages
Quora Pixel	Analytics
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
Swiper	JavaScript libraries
VWO	Analytics, A/B Testing
WordPress 6.9.4	CMS, Blogs
WordPress Multisite	Hosting
Cloudflare	CDN
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
jsDelivr	CDN
Lodash 1.13.7	JavaScript libraries
Moove GDPR Consent	Cookie compliance, WordPress plugins
RSS	Miscellaneous
Yoast SEO 27.7	SEO, WordPress plugins

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.itagprotracker.com/	Response headers do not include the X-Content-Type-Options HTTP security header

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the X-Content-Type-Options header. This header is particularly important for preventing Internet Explorer from reinterpreting the content of a web page (MIME-sniffing) and thus overriding the value of the Content-Type header.

Risk description

The risk is that lack of this header could make possible attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting or phishing in Internet Explorer browsers.

Recommendation

We recommend setting the X-Content-Type-Options header such as `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.itagprotracker.com/	Response headers do not include the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application lacks the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header in its responses. This security header is crucial as it instructs browsers to only establish secure (HTTPS) connections with the web server and reject any HTTP connections.

Risk description

The risk is that lack of this header permits an attacker to force a victim user to initiate a clear-text HTTP connection to the server, thus opening the possibility to eavesdrop on the network traffic and extract sensitive information (e.g. session cookies).

Recommendation

The Strict-Transport-Security HTTP header should be sent with each HTTPS response. The syntax is as follows: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=<seconds>[; includeSubDomains]` The parameter `max-age` gives the time frame for requirement of HTTPS in seconds and should be chosen quite high, e.g. several months. A value below 7776000 is considered as too low by this scanner check. The flag `includeSubDomains` defines that the policy applies also for sub domains of the sender of the response.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.itagprotracker.com/	Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.

Risk description

The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.

Recommendation

Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1021
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
https://www.itagprotracker.com/robots.txt

Vulnerability description

We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.

Risk description

There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.

Recommendation

We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.itagprotracker.com/	Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the `<meta/>` tag with name 'referrer' is not present in the response.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.

Risk description

The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.

Recommendation

The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Clipboard.js	JavaScript libraries
jQuery CDN	CDN
jQuery Migrate 3.4.1	JavaScript libraries
Google Analytics	Analytics
HTTP/3	Miscellaneous
jQuery 3.6.0	JavaScript libraries
MySQL	Databases
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
PHP	Programming languages
Quora Pixel	Analytics
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
Swiper	JavaScript libraries
VWO	Analytics, A/B Testing
WordPress 6.9.4	CMS, Blogs
WordPress Multisite	Hosting
Cloudflare	CDN
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
jsDelivr	CDN
Lodash 1.13.7	JavaScript libraries
Moove GDPR Consent	Cookie compliance, WordPress plugins
RSS	Miscellaneous
Yoast SEO 27.7	SEO, WordPress plugins

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Classification

CWE	CWE-200
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
Missing: https://www.itagprotracker.com/.well-known/security.txt

Vulnerability description

We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.

Risk description

There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.

Recommendation

We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1188
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Method	Parameters	Evidence
https://www.itagprotracker.com/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed	GET	Query: format=xml url=https://www.itagprotracker.com/ Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36	Possible API endpoint found at `/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed`
https://www.itagprotracker.com/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed	GET	Query: url=https://www.itagprotracker.com/ Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36	Possible API endpoint found at `/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed`

Vulnerability description

We found API endpoints while crawling the given web application.

Risk description

These endpoints may represent an attack surface for malicious actors interested in API-specific vulnerabilities.

Recommendation

Use the API Scanner to perform a more thorough vulnerability check for these endpoints, if an API specification is present.

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Evidence

We managed to detect that WordPress has reached the End-of-Life (EOL).

Version detected: 6.9.4 End-of-life date: 2026-05-20 Latest version for the cycle: 6.9.4 This release cycle (6.9) doesn't have long-term-support (LTS). The cycle was released on 2025-12-02 and its latest release date was 2026-03-11.

Risk description

Using end-of-life (EOL) software poses significant security risks for organizations. EOL software no longer receives updates, including critical security patches. This creates a vulnerability landscape where known and potentially new security flaws remain unaddressed, making the software an attractive target for malicious actors. Attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access, disrupt services, or steal sensitive data. Moreover, without updates, compatibility issues arise with newer technologies, leading to operational inefficiencies and increased potential for system failures. Additionally, regulatory and compliance risks accompany the use of EOL software. Many industries have strict data protection regulations that require up-to-date software to ensure the highest security standards. Non-compliance can result in hefty fines and legal consequences. Organizations also risk damaging their reputation if a breach occurs due to outdated software, eroding customer trust and potentially leading to a loss of business. Therefore, continuing to use EOL software undermines both security posture and business integrity, necessitating timely upgrades and proactive risk management strategies.

Recommendation

To mitigate the risks associated with end-of-life (EOL) software, it's crucial to take proactive steps. Start by identifying any EOL software currently in use within your organization. Once identified, prioritize upgrading or replacing these applications with supported versions that receive regular updates and security patches. This not only helps close security gaps but also ensures better compatibility with newer technologies, enhancing overall system efficiency and reliability.Additionally, develop a comprehensive software lifecycle management plan. This plan should include regular audits to identify upcoming EOL dates and a schedule for timely updates or replacements. Train your IT staff and users about the importance of keeping software up to date and the risks associated with using outdated versions. By maintaining a proactive approach to software management, you can significantly reduce security risks, ensure compliance with industry regulations, and protect your organization's reputation and customer trust.

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Cloudflare	CDN

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Cloudflare	CDN

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Operating System	Accuracy
FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE	91%

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
WordPress 6.9.4	CMS, Blogs
MySQL	Databases
PHP	Programming languages
Yoast SEO 27.7	SEO, WordPress plugins
Moove GDPR Consent	Cookie compliance, WordPress plugins
WordPress Multisite	Hosting
Clipboard.js	JavaScript libraries
Lodash 1.13.7	JavaScript libraries
jQuery Migrate 3.4.1	JavaScript libraries
jQuery CDN	CDN
Google Analytics	Analytics
VWO	Analytics, A/B Testing
Twitter Emoji (Twemoji)	Font scripts
Quora Pixel	Analytics
jQuery 3.6.0	JavaScript libraries
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
Swiper	JavaScript libraries
jsDelivr	CDN
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
Cloudflare	CDN
RSS	Miscellaneous
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
HTTP/3	Miscellaneous

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Cloudflare	CDN

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
www.itagprotracker.com	A	IPv4 address	104.21.34.80
www.itagprotracker.com	A	IPv4 address	172.67.157.18
www.itagprotracker.com	AAAA	IPv6 address	2606:4700:3035::6815:2250
www.itagprotracker.com	AAAA	IPv6 address	2606:4700:3030::ac43:9d12

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.