Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

http://surveymonkey.com/ (redirect)

Scanned target: https://www.surveymonkey.com/

Submitted: Jun 12, 2026 from ME

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

high

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

Screenshot could not be taken.

Title:	SurveyMonkey: The World’s Most Popular Survey Platform
Description:	Easily create surveys and forms with AI and templates for employee and customer feedback, market research, event registrations and more. Get started free.

IP Information

ip_address	99.86.171.14
country	IT
network_name	Amazon.com, Inc.
asn	AS16509

ip_address	99.86.171.87
country	IT
network_name	Amazon.com, Inc.
asn	AS16509

ip_address	99.86.171.101
country	IT
network_name	Amazon.com, Inc.
asn	AS16509

ip_address	99.86.171.25
country	IT
network_name	Amazon.com, Inc.
asn	AS16509

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	Amazon CloudFront httpd -
443/tcp	https	- -

Web Technologies

Software / Version	Category
Amazon Web Services	PaaS
AWS Certificate Manager	SSL/TLS certificate authorities
Amazon CloudFront	CDN
Linkedin Insight Tag	Analytics
JSS	JavaScript frameworks, Development
core-js 3.49.0	JavaScript libraries
GraphQL	Programming languages
HTTP/3	Miscellaneous
MySQL	Databases
Next.js 14.2.35	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
Next.js App Router	JavaScript frameworks, Web servers
Nginx	Web servers, Reverse proxies
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
PayPal	Payment processors
PHP	Programming languages
Preact	JavaScript libraries
React	JavaScript frameworks
React Router 6	JavaScript frameworks
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
PWA	Miscellaneous
Webpack	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
Apollo 3.14.0	JavaScript libraries
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
HSTS	Security
RSS	Miscellaneous
TypeScript	Programming languages

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

CVE	CVSS	EPSS Score	EPSS Percentile	Summary
CVE-2026-44578	8.6	0.02829	0.84772	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 13.4.13 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, self-hosted applications using the built-in Node.js server can be vulnerable to server-side request forgery through crafted WebSocket upgrade requests. An attacker can cause the server to proxy requests to arbitrary internal or external destinations, which may expose internal services or cloud metadata endpoints. Vercel-hosted deployments are not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5.
CVE-2026-44573	7.5	0.00351	0.26796	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 12.2.0 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, Applications using the Pages Router with i18n configured and middleware/proxy-based authorization can allow unauthorized access to protected page data through locale-less /_next/data/<buildId>/<page>.json requests. In affected configurations, middleware does not run for the unprefixed data route, allowing an attacker to retrieve SSR JSON for protected pages without passing the intended authorization checks. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5.
CVE-2026-27980	6.9	0.00683	0.47619	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 10.0.0 and prior to version 16.1.7, the default Next.js image optimization disk cache (`/_next/image`) did not have a configurable upper bound, allowing unbounded cache growth. An attacker could generate many unique image-optimization variants and exhaust disk space, causing denial of service. This is fixed in version 16.1.7 by adding an LRU-backed disk cache with `images.maximumDiskCacheSize`, including eviction of least-recently-used entries when the limit is exceeded. Setting `maximumDiskCacheSize: 0` disables disk caching. If upgrading is not immediately possible, periodically clean `.next/cache/images` and/or reduce variant cardinality (e.g., tighten values for `images.localPatterns`, `images.remotePatterns`, and `images.qualities`).
CVE-2026-29057	6.3	0.00427	0.34003	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 9.5.0 and prior to versions 15.5.13 and 16.1.7, when Next.js rewrites proxy traffic to an external backend, a crafted `DELETE`/`OPTIONS` request using `Transfer-Encoding: chunked` could trigger request boundary disagreement between the proxy and backend. This could allow request smuggling through rewritten routes. An attacker could smuggle a second request to unintended backend routes (for example, internal/admin endpoints), bypassing assumptions that only the configured rewrite destination/path is reachable. This does not impact applications hosted on providers that handle rewrites at the CDN level, such as Vercel. The vulnerability originated in an upstream library vendored by Next.js. It is fixed in Next.js 15.5.13 and 16.1.7 by updating that dependency’s behavior so `content-length: 0` is added only when both `content-length` and `transfer-encoding` are absent, and `transfer-encoding` is no longer removed in that code path. If upgrading is not immediately possible, block chunked `DELETE`/`OPTIONS` requests on rewritten routes at the edge/proxy, and/or enforce authentication/authorization on backend routes.
CVE-2026-44580	6.1	0.00205	0.10411	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 13.0.0 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, applications that use beforeInteractive scripts together with untrusted content can be vulnerable to cross-site scripting. In affected versions, serialized script content was not escaped safely before being embedded into the document, which could allow attacker-controlled input to break out of the intended script context and execute arbitrary JavaScript in a visitor's browser. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5.

Vulnerability description

Outdated or vulnerable software components include versions of server-side software that are no longer supported or have known, publicly disclosed vulnerabilities. Using outdated software significantly increases the attack surface of a system and may allow unauthorized access, data leaks, or service disruptions. Vulnerabilities in these components are often well-documented and actively exploited by attackers. Without security patches or vendor support, any weaknesses remain unmitigated, exposing the application to risks. In some cases, even after patching, the reported version may remain unchanged, requiring manual verification.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could search for an appropriate exploit (or create one himself) for any of these vulnerabilities and use it to attack the system. Since the vulnerabilities were discovered using only version-based testing, the risk level for this finding will not exceed 'high' severity. Critical risks will be assigned to vulnerabilities identified through accurate active testing methods.

Recommendation

In order to eliminate the risk of these vulnerabilities, we recommend you check the installed software version and upgrade to the latest version.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1035
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Cookie Name	Evidence
https://www.surveymonkey.com/	ep201	The server responded with Set-Cookie header(s) that does not specify the HttpOnly flag: Set-Cookie: ep201="CkgJ2qc/qO3o370s/bffjTn9rV0="

Vulnerability description

We found that a cookie has been set without the HttpOnly flag, which means it can be accessed by potentially malicious JavaScript code running inside the web page. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker who injects malicious JavaScript code on the page (e.g. by using an XSS attack) can access the cookie and can send it to another site. In case of a session cookie, this could lead to session hijacking.

Recommendation

Ensure that the HttpOnly flag is set for all cookies.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1004
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Cookie Name	Evidence
https://www.surveymonkey.com/	ep201	Set-Cookie: .surveymonkey.com

Vulnerability description

We found that the target application sets cookies with a domain scope that is too broad. Specifically, cookies intended for use within a particular application are configured in such a way that they can be accessed by multiple subdomains of the same primary domain.

Risk description

The risk is that a cookie set for example.com may be sent along with the requests sent to dev.example.com, calendar.example.com, hostedsite.example.com. Potentially risky websites under your main domain may access those cookies and use the victim session from the main site.

Recommendation

The `Domain` attribute should be set to the origin host to limit the scope to that particular server. For example if the application resides on server app.mysite.com, then it should be set to `Domain=app.mysite.com`

Classification

CWE	CWE-614
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Amazon Web Services	PaaS
AWS Certificate Manager	SSL/TLS certificate authorities
Amazon CloudFront	CDN
Linkedin Insight Tag	Analytics
JSS	JavaScript frameworks, Development
core-js 3.49.0	JavaScript libraries
GraphQL	Programming languages
HTTP/3	Miscellaneous
MySQL	Databases
Next.js 14.2.35	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
Next.js App Router	JavaScript frameworks, Web servers
Nginx	Web servers, Reverse proxies
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
PayPal	Payment processors
PHP	Programming languages
Preact	JavaScript libraries
React	JavaScript frameworks
React Router 6	JavaScript frameworks
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
PWA	Miscellaneous
Webpack	Miscellaneous
Priority Hints	Performance
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
Apollo 3.14.0	JavaScript libraries
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
HSTS	Security
RSS	Miscellaneous
TypeScript	Programming languages

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Classification

CWE	CWE-200
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
https://www.surveymonkey.com/robots.txt

Vulnerability description

We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.

Risk description

There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.

Recommendation

We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).

Evidence

URL Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://www.surveymonkey.com/	Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. script-src: 'unsafe-eval' allows the execution of code injected into DOM APIs such as eval(). frame-ancestors: This directive tells the browser whether you want to allow your site to be framed or not. By preventing a browser from framing your site you can defend against attacks like clickjacking. The recommended value is 'none' or 'self'. default-src: https: URI in default-src allows the execution of unsafe scripts. script-src: 'self' can be problematic if you host JSONP, Angular or user uploaded files. default-src: data: URI in default-src allows the execution of unsafe scripts. object-src: We recommend restricting object-src to 'none'. script-src: https: URI in script-src allows the execution of unsafe scripts. script-src: ''unsafe-inline'' allows the execution of unsafe in-page scripts and event handlers.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/

Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. script-src: 'unsafe-eval' allows the execution of code injected into DOM APIs such as eval(). frame-ancestors: This directive tells the browser whether you want to allow your site to be framed or not. By preventing a browser from framing your site you can defend against attacks like clickjacking. The recommended value is 'none' or 'self'. default-src: https: URI in default-src allows the execution of unsafe scripts. script-src: 'self' can be problematic if you host JSONP, Angular or user uploaded files. default-src: data: URI in default-src allows the execution of unsafe scripts. object-src: We recommend restricting object-src to 'none'. script-src: https: URI in script-src allows the execution of unsafe scripts. script-src: ''unsafe-inline'' allows the execution of unsafe in-page scripts and event handlers.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header configured for the web application includes unsafe directives. The CSP header activates a protection mechanism implemented in web browsers which prevents exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities (XSS) by restricting the sources from which content can be loaded or executed.

Risk description

For example, if the unsafe-inline directive is present in the CSP header, the execution of inline scripts and event handlers is allowed. This can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the vulnerable application.

Recommendation

Remove the unsafe values from the directives, adopt nonces or hashes for safer inclusion of inline scripts if they are needed, and explicitly define the sources from which scripts, styles, images or other resources can be loaded.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1021
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
Missing: https://www.surveymonkey.com/.well-known/security.txt

Vulnerability description

We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.

Risk description

There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.

Recommendation

We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1188
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Evidence

CVE	CVSS	EPSS Score	EPSS Percentile	CISA KEV	Summary
CVE-2026-44578	8.6	0.02829	0.84772	No	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 13.4.13 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, self-hosted applications using the built-in Node.js server can be vulnerable to server-side request forgery through crafted WebSocket upgrade requests. An attacker can cause the server to proxy requests to arbitrary internal or external destinations, which may expose internal services or cloud metadata endpoints. Vercel-hosted deployments are not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5.
CVE-2026-44573	7.5	0.00351	0.26796	No	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 12.2.0 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, Applications using the Pages Router with i18n configured and middleware/proxy-based authorization can allow unauthorized access to protected page data through locale-less /_next/data/<buildId>/<page>.json requests. In affected configurations, middleware does not run for the unprefixed data route, allowing an attacker to retrieve SSR JSON for protected pages without passing the intended authorization checks. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5.
CVE-2026-27980	6.9	0.00683	0.47619	No	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 10.0.0 and prior to version 16.1.7, the default Next.js image optimization disk cache (`/_next/image`) did not have a configurable upper bound, allowing unbounded cache growth. An attacker could generate many unique image-optimization variants and exhaust disk space, causing denial of service. This is fixed in version 16.1.7 by adding an LRU-backed disk cache with `images.maximumDiskCacheSize`, including eviction of least-recently-used entries when the limit is exceeded. Setting `maximumDiskCacheSize: 0` disables disk caching. If upgrading is not immediately possible, periodically clean `.next/cache/images` and/or reduce variant cardinality (e.g., tighten values for `images.localPatterns`, `images.remotePatterns`, and `images.qualities`).
CVE-2026-29057	6.3	0.00427	0.34003	No	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 9.5.0 and prior to versions 15.5.13 and 16.1.7, when Next.js rewrites proxy traffic to an external backend, a crafted `DELETE`/`OPTIONS` request using `Transfer-Encoding: chunked` could trigger request boundary disagreement between the proxy and backend. This could allow request smuggling through rewritten routes. An attacker could smuggle a second request to unintended backend routes (for example, internal/admin endpoints), bypassing assumptions that only the configured rewrite destination/path is reachable. This does not impact applications hosted on providers that handle rewrites at the CDN level, such as Vercel. The vulnerability originated in an upstream library vendored by Next.js. It is fixed in Next.js 15.5.13 and 16.1.7 by updating that dependency’s behavior so `content-length: 0` is added only when both `content-length` and `transfer-encoding` are absent, and `transfer-encoding` is no longer removed in that code path. If upgrading is not immediately possible, block chunked `DELETE`/`OPTIONS` requests on rewritten routes at the edge/proxy, and/or enforce authentication/authorization on backend routes.
CVE-2026-44580	6.1	0.00205	0.10411	No	Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 13.0.0 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, applications that use beforeInteractive scripts together with untrusted content can be vulnerable to cross-site scripting. In affected versions, serialized script content was not escaped safely before being embedded into the document, which could allow attacker-controlled input to break out of the intended script context and execute arbitrary JavaScript in a visitor's browser. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5.

Vulnerability description

Vulnerabilities found for Next.js 14.2.35

Risk description

These vulnerabilities expose the affected applications to the risk of unauthorized access to confidential data and possibly to denial of service attacks. An attacker could search for an appropriate exploit (or create one) for any of these vulnerabilities and use it to attack the system. Notes: - The vulnerabilities are identified based on the server's version.; - Only the first 5 vulnerabilities with the highest risk are shown for each port.; Since the vulnerabilities were discovered using only version-based testing, the risk level for this finding will not exceed "high" severity. Critical risks will be assigned to vulnerabilities identified through accurate active testing methods.

Recommendation

We recommend you to upgrade the affected software to the latest version in order to eliminate the risks imposed by these vulnerabilities.

Evidence

We managed to detect that Next.js has reached the End-of-Life (EOL).

Version detected: 14.2.35 End-of-life date: 2025-10-26 Latest version for the cycle: 14.2.35 This release cycle (14) does have long-term-support (LTS). The cycle was released on 2023-10-26 and its latest release date was 2025-12-11.

Risk description

Using end-of-life (EOL) software poses significant security risks for organizations. EOL software no longer receives updates, including critical security patches. This creates a vulnerability landscape where known and potentially new security flaws remain unaddressed, making the software an attractive target for malicious actors. Attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access, disrupt services, or steal sensitive data. Moreover, without updates, compatibility issues arise with newer technologies, leading to operational inefficiencies and increased potential for system failures. Additionally, regulatory and compliance risks accompany the use of EOL software. Many industries have strict data protection regulations that require up-to-date software to ensure the highest security standards. Non-compliance can result in hefty fines and legal consequences. Organizations also risk damaging their reputation if a breach occurs due to outdated software, eroding customer trust and potentially leading to a loss of business. Therefore, continuing to use EOL software undermines both security posture and business integrity, necessitating timely upgrades and proactive risk management strategies.

Recommendation

To mitigate the risks associated with end-of-life (EOL) software, it's crucial to take proactive steps. Start by identifying any EOL software currently in use within your organization. Once identified, prioritize upgrading or replacing these applications with supported versions that receive regular updates and security patches. This not only helps close security gaps but also ensures better compatibility with newer technologies, enhancing overall system efficiency and reliability.Additionally, develop a comprehensive software lifecycle management plan. This plan should include regular audits to identify upcoming EOL dates and a schedule for timely updates or replacements. Train your IT staff and users about the importance of keeping software up to date and the risks associated with using outdated versions. By maintaining a proactive approach to software management, you can significantly reduce security risks, ensure compliance with industry regulations, and protect your organization's reputation and customer trust.

Operating System	Accuracy
Crestron XPanel control system	87%

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
Next.js 14.2.35	JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator
JSS	JavaScript frameworks, Development
TypeScript	Programming languages
GraphQL	Programming languages
MySQL	Databases
PHP	Programming languages
Nginx	Web servers, Reverse proxies
React	JavaScript frameworks
Amazon Web Services	PaaS
React Router 6	JavaScript frameworks
Next.js App Router	JavaScript frameworks, Web servers
PayPal	Payment processors
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
core-js 3.49.0	JavaScript libraries
Apollo 3.14.0	JavaScript libraries
Priority Hints	Performance
Preact	JavaScript libraries
Linkedin Insight Tag	Analytics
DoubleClick Floodlight	Advertising
HSTS	Security
AWS Certificate Manager	SSL/TLS certificate authorities
Amazon CloudFront	CDN
Webpack	Miscellaneous
RSS	Miscellaneous
PWA	Miscellaneous
Open Graph	Miscellaneous
HTTP/3	Miscellaneous

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
www.surveymonkey.com	A	IPv4 address	99.86.171.101
www.surveymonkey.com	A	IPv4 address	99.86.171.25
www.surveymonkey.com	A	IPv4 address	99.86.171.14
www.surveymonkey.com	A	IPv4 address	99.86.171.87
www.surveymonkey.com	NS	Name server	ns-1511.awsdns-60.org
www.surveymonkey.com	NS	Name server	ns-1676.awsdns-17.co.uk
www.surveymonkey.com	NS	Name server	ns-39.awsdns-04.com
www.surveymonkey.com	NS	Name server	ns-681.awsdns-21.net
www.surveymonkey.com	SOA	Start of Authority	ns-39.awsdns-04.com. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400
www.surveymonkey.com	CNAME	Canonical name	g-sm-prod-cloudeng-frontdoor.svmkinfra.com

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.