Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

http://www.fcdi.co.uk/ (redirect)

Scanned target: https://fcdi.co.uk/

Submitted: Feb 17, 2026 from TL

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

high

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

Screenshot could not be taken.

Title:	Firepool Centre for Digital Innovation
Description:	A new £11 million, 2,493 square-metre innovation facility in the heart of Taunton

IP Information

ip_address	185.53.56.90
country	GB
network_name	Krystal Hosting Ltd
asn	AS12488

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	LiteSpeed -
443/tcp	https	LiteSpeed -

Web Technologies

Software / Version	Category
cdnjs	CDN
Bootstrap 4.6.1	UI frameworks
jQuery Migrate	JavaScript libraries
Google Font API	Font scripts
jQuery 3.7.0	JavaScript libraries
jQuery UI 1.13.3	JavaScript libraries
Slick	JavaScript libraries
Leaflet 1.9.3	Maps
lit-element 4.1.1	JavaScript libraries
LiteSpeed	Web servers
Livefyre 1.9.3	Comment systems
Google Maps	Maps
Moment.js 2.29.1	JavaScript libraries
MySQL	Databases
PHP	Programming languages
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
Advanced Custom Fields	WordPress plugins
Chart.js 3.9.1	JavaScript graphics
Cloudflare	CDN
reCAPTCHA	Security
jsDelivr	CDN
HSTS	Security

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

CVE	CVSS	EPSS Score	EPSS Percentile	Summary
CVE-2022-31129	7.5	0.03435	0.87199	moment is a JavaScript date library for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates. Affected versions of moment were found to use an inefficient parsing algorithm. Specifically using string-to-date parsing in moment (more specifically rfc2822 parsing, which is tried by default) has quadratic (N^2) complexity on specific inputs. Users may notice a noticeable slowdown is observed with inputs above 10k characters. Users who pass user-provided strings without sanity length checks to moment constructor are vulnerable to (Re)DoS attacks. The problem is patched in 2.29.4, the patch can be applied to all affected versions with minimal tweaking. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should consider limiting date lengths accepted from user input.
CVE-2022-24785	7.5	0.01673	0.81793	Moment.js is a JavaScript date library for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates. A path traversal vulnerability impacts npm (server) users of Moment.js between versions 1.0.1 and 2.29.1, especially if a user-provided locale string is directly used to switch moment locale. This problem is patched in 2.29.2, and the patch can be applied to all affected versions. As a workaround, sanitize the user-provided locale name before passing it to Moment.js.

Vulnerability description

Outdated or vulnerable software components include versions of server-side software that are no longer supported or have known, publicly disclosed vulnerabilities. Using outdated software significantly increases the attack surface of a system and may allow unauthorized access, data leaks, or service disruptions. Vulnerabilities in these components are often well-documented and actively exploited by attackers. Without security patches or vendor support, any weaknesses remain unmitigated, exposing the application to risks. In some cases, even after patching, the reported version may remain unchanged, requiring manual verification.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could search for an appropriate exploit (or create one himself) for any of these vulnerabilities and use it to attack the system. Since the vulnerabilities were discovered using only version-based testing, the risk level for this finding will not exceed 'high' severity. Critical risks will be assigned to vulnerabilities identified through accurate active testing methods.

Recommendation

In order to eliminate the risk of these vulnerabilities, we recommend you check the installed software version and upgrade to the latest version.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1035
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
cdnjs	CDN
Bootstrap 4.6.1	UI frameworks
jQuery Migrate	JavaScript libraries
Google Font API	Font scripts
jQuery 3.7.0	JavaScript libraries
jQuery UI 1.13.3	JavaScript libraries
Slick	JavaScript libraries
Leaflet 1.9.3	Maps
lit-element 4.1.1	JavaScript libraries
LiteSpeed	Web servers
Livefyre 1.9.3	Comment systems
Google Maps	Maps
Moment.js 2.29.1	JavaScript libraries
MySQL	Databases
PHP	Programming languages
WordPress	CMS, Blogs
Advanced Custom Fields	WordPress plugins
Chart.js 3.9.1	JavaScript graphics
Cloudflare	CDN
reCAPTCHA	Security
jsDelivr	CDN
HSTS	Security

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Evidence

URL	Method	Parameters	Evidence
https://fcdi.co.uk/wp-content/themes/sc-micro/	GET	Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36	Response has an internal server error status code: 500

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's website does not properly handle or incorrectly manages exceptional conditions like Internal Server Errors. These errors can reveal sensitive information through their error messages. For instance, an error message could inadvertently disclose system paths or private application details.

Risk description

The risk exists that attackers could utilize information revealed in Internal Server Error messages to mount more targeted and effective attacks. Detailed error messages could, for example, expose a path traversal weakness (CWE-22) or other exploitable system vulnerabilities.

Recommendation

Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience, and nobody else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic and not being cryptic enough. They should not necessarily reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Such detailed information can be used to refine the original attack to increase the chances of success. If errors must be tracked in some detail, capture them in log messages - but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Avoid recording highly sensitive information such as passwords in any form. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a username is valid or not.

Classification

CWE	CWE-209
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://fcdi.co.uk/	Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. script-src: 'unsafe-eval' allows the execution of code injected into DOM APIs such as eval(). script-src: 'self' can be problematic if you host JSONP, Angular or user uploaded files. frame-ancestors: This directive tells the browser whether you want to allow your site to be framed or not. By preventing a browser from framing your site you can defend against attacks like clickjacking. The recommended value is 'none' or 'self'. default-src: The default-src directive should be set as a fall-back when other restrictions have not been specified. script-src: ''unsafe-inline'' allows the execution of unsafe in-page scripts and event handlers.

https://fcdi.co.uk/

Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. script-src: 'unsafe-eval' allows the execution of code injected into DOM APIs such as eval(). script-src: 'self' can be problematic if you host JSONP, Angular or user uploaded files. frame-ancestors: This directive tells the browser whether you want to allow your site to be framed or not. By preventing a browser from framing your site you can defend against attacks like clickjacking. The recommended value is 'none' or 'self'. default-src: The default-src directive should be set as a fall-back when other restrictions have not been specified. script-src: ''unsafe-inline'' allows the execution of unsafe in-page scripts and event handlers.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header configured for the web application includes unsafe directives. The CSP header activates a protection mechanism implemented in web browsers which prevents exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities (XSS) by restricting the sources from which content can be loaded or executed.

Risk description

For example, if the unsafe-inline directive is present in the CSP header, the execution of inline scripts and event handlers is allowed. This can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the vulnerable application.

Recommendation

Remove the unsafe values from the directives, adopt nonces or hashes for safer inclusion of inline scripts if they are needed, and explicitly define the sources from which scripts, styles, images or other resources can be loaded.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://fcdi.co.uk/	Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the `<meta/>` tag with name 'referrer' is not present in the response.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.

Risk description

The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.

Recommendation

The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017
OWASP Top 10 - 2021

Evidence

URL
https://fcdi.co.uk/robots.txt

Vulnerability description

We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.

Risk description

There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.

Recommendation

We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).

Evidence

URL	Method	Parameters	Evidence
https://fcdi.co.uk/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed	GET	Query: format=xml url=https://fcdi.co.uk/ Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36	Possible API endpoint found at `/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed`
https://fcdi.co.uk/wp-json/wp/v2	GET	Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36	Possible API endpoint found at `/wp-json/wp/v2`

Vulnerability description

We found API endpoints while crawling the given web application.

Risk description

These endpoints may represent an attack surface for malicious actors interested in API-specific vulnerabilities.

Recommendation

Use the API Scanner to perform a more thorough vulnerability check for these endpoints, if an API specification is present.

Evidence

URL
Missing: https://fcdi.co.uk/.well-known/security.txt

Vulnerability description

We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.

Risk description

There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.

Recommendation

We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
fcdi.co.uk	A	IPv4 address	185.53.56.90
fcdi.co.uk	NS	Name server	ns2.onyx.io
fcdi.co.uk	NS	Name server	ns1.onyx.io
fcdi.co.uk	SOA	Start of Authority	ns1.onyx.io. support.onyx.io. 1771337233 3600 120 2419200 600
fcdi.co.uk	TXT	Text record	"google-site-verification=_Ngrpydc3lRDRG1vswTQSyoQXsf_Ld6xDGKi6fKTDJ0"

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.