Vulnerability Scan Result
| Title: | SS26 Sell-in GSG |
| Description: | No description found |
| IP address | 34.65.78.110 |
| Country | CH  |
| AS number | AS396982 |
| Net name | Google LLC |
80/tcp | http | - - |
443/tcp | https | - - |
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Astro | Static site generator, JavaScript frameworks |
| Google Analytics | Analytics |
| Open Graph | Miscellaneous |
| Vue.js | JavaScript frameworks |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| OneTrust | Cookie compliance |
| HSTS | Security |
| YouTube | Video players |
Web Application Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://bsurbfoi.events.on.com/ | Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.
Risk description
The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.
Recommendation
Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-693 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | A6 - Security Misconfiguration |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 | A5 - Security Misconfiguration |
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Astro | Static site generator, JavaScript frameworks |
| Google Analytics | Analytics |
| Open Graph | Miscellaneous |
| Vue.js | JavaScript frameworks |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| OneTrust | Cookie compliance |
| HSTS | Security |
| YouTube | Video players |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Classification
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | A6 - Security Misconfiguration |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 | A5 - Security Misconfiguration |
Evidence
Vulnerability description
Website is accessible.
Vulnerability description
We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.
Risk description
There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.
Recommendation
We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.
Classification
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | A6 - Security Misconfiguration |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 | A5 - Security Misconfiguration |
Evidence
| URL | Method | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| https://bsurbfoi.events.on.com/ | OPTIONS | We did a HTTP OPTIONS request. The server responded with a 405 status code and the header: `Allow: GET,HEAD` Request / Response |
Vulnerability description
We have noticed that the webserver responded with an Allow HTTP header when an OPTIONS HTTP request was sent. This method responds to requests by providing information about the methods available for the target resource.
Risk description
The only risk this might present nowadays is revealing debug HTTP methods that can be used on the server. This can present a danger if any of those methods can lead to sensitive information, like authentication information, secret keys.
Recommendation
We recommend that you check for unused HTTP methods or even better, disable the OPTIONS method. This can be done using your webserver configuration.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-16 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | A6 - Security Misconfiguration |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 | A5 - Security Misconfiguration |
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| Domain Queried | DNS Record Type | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | A | IPv4 address | 34.65.78.110 |
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | NS | Name server | ns-a.eurodns.com |
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | NS | Name server | ns-b.eurodns.org |
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | NS | Name server | ns-c.eurodns.eu |
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | NS | Name server | ns-d.eurodns.biz |
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | SOA | Start of Authority | ns-a.eurodns.com. hostmaster.eurodns.com. 2024102801 43200 7200 1209600 3600 |
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | SPF | Sender Policy Framework | "v=spf1 include:spf.brevo.com include:spf.sendinblue.com include:spf.mailserver.evenito.com mx ~all" |
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issue "sectigo.com" |
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issuewild "sectigo.com" |
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issue "pki.goog" |
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | CAA | Certificate Authority Authorization | 0 issuewild "pki.goog" |
| www.bsurbfoi.events.on.com | CNAME | Canonical name | evenito.site |
Risk description
An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.
Recommendation
We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.
Evidence
Vulnerability description
OS detection couldn't determine the operating system.
Evidence
We managed to detect the redirect using the following Request / Response chain.
Recommendation
Vulnerability checks are skipped for ports that redirect to another port. We recommend scanning the redirected port directly.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| YouTube | Video players |
| Vue.js | JavaScript frameworks |
| OneTrust | Cookie compliance |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| Google Analytics | Analytics |
| HSTS | Security |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.