Vulnerability Scan Result
| Title: | Willow Papery |
| Description: | No description found |
| ip_address | 13.58.199.214 |
| country | US  |
| network_name | Amazon Inc |
| asn | AS16509 |
22/tcp | ssh | OpenSSH 7.2p2 Ubuntu 4ubuntu2.8 |
80/tcp | http | nginx - |
443/tcp | https | nginx - |
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| AngularJS 1.4.14 | JavaScript frameworks |
| Babel | Miscellaneous |
| Bootstrap 3.3.4 | UI frameworks |
| core-js 2.6.12 | JavaScript libraries |
| Google Analytics | Analytics |
| GSAP 1.19.0 | JavaScript frameworks |
| jQuery 1.11.1 | JavaScript libraries |
| lit-element 4.1.1 | JavaScript libraries |
| Google Maps | Maps |
| Nginx | Web servers, Reverse proxies |
| Open Graph | Miscellaneous |
| React | JavaScript frameworks |
| Ruby | Programming languages |
| Ruby on Rails | Web frameworks |
| ScrollMagic 2.0.5 | JavaScript libraries |
| Select2 | JavaScript libraries |
| Stripe 2 | Payment processors |
| Webpack | Miscellaneous |
| WookMark | JavaScript libraries |
| reCAPTCHA | Security |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| Lodash 3.10.1 | JavaScript libraries |
| Cart Functionality | Ecommerce |
Web Application Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| Risk Level | CVSS | CVE | Summary | Affected software |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | CVE-2024-21490 | This affects versions of the package angular from 1.3.0. A regular expression used to split the value of the ng-srcset directive is vulnerable to super-linear runtime due to backtracking. With large carefully-crafted input, this can result in catastrophic backtracking and cause a denial of service. **Note:** This package is EOL and will not receive any updates to address this issue. Users should migrate to [@angular/core](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@angular/core). | angular.js 1.4.14 | |
| 6.8 | CVE-2018-16487 | A prototype pollution vulnerability was found in lodash <4.17.11 where the functions merge, mergeWith, and defaultsDeep can be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype. | lodash 3.10.1 | |
| 6.5 | CVE-2021-23337 | Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function. | lodash 3.10.1 | |
| 6.4 | CVE-2024-6484 | A vulnerability has been identified in Bootstrap that exposes users to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. The issue is present in the carousel component, where the data-slide and data-slide-to attributes can be exploited through the href attribute of an <a> tag due to inadequate sanitization. This vulnerability could potentially enable attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript within the victim's browser. | bootstrap 3.3.4 | |
| 6.4 | CVE-2019-10744 | Versions of lodash lower than 4.17.12 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The function defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload. | lodash 3.10.1 | |
| 5.8 | CVE-2020-8203 | Prototype pollution attack when using _.zipObjectDeep in lodash before 4.17.20. | lodash 3.10.1 | |
| 5 | CVE-2019-10768 | In AngularJS before 1.7.9 the function `merge()` could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of `Object.prototype` using a `__proto__` payload. | angular.js 1.4.14 | |
| 5 | CVE-2020-28500 | Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the toNumber, trim and trimEnd functions. | lodash 3.10.1 | |
| 4.8 | CVE-2024-8372 | Improper sanitization of the value of the 'srcset' attribute in AngularJS allows attackers to bypass common image source restrictions, which can also lead to a form of Content Spoofing https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Content_Spoofing . This issue affects AngularJS versions 1.3.0-rc.4 and greater. Note: The AngularJS project is End-of-Life and will not receive any updates to address this issue. For more information see here https://docs.angularjs.org/misc/version-support-status . | angular.js 1.4.14 | |
| 4.8 | CVE-2024-8373 | Improper sanitization of the value of the [srcset] attribute in <source> HTML elements in AngularJS allows attackers to bypass common image source restrictions, which can also lead to a form of Content Spoofing https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Content_Spoofing . This issue affects all versions of AngularJS. Note: The AngularJS project is End-of-Life and will not receive any updates to address this issue. For more information see here https://docs.angularjs.org/misc/version-support-status . | angular.js 1.4.14 | |
| 4.3 | CVE-2018-14040 | In Bootstrap before 4.1.2, XSS is possible in the collapse data-parent attribute. | bootstrap 3.3.4 | |
| 4.3 | CVE-2018-14042 | In Bootstrap before 4.1.2, XSS is possible in the data-container property of tooltip. | bootstrap 3.3.4 | |
| 4.3 | CVE-2016-10735 | In Bootstrap 3.x before 3.4.0 and 4.x-beta before 4.0.0-beta.2, XSS is possible in the data-target attribute, a different vulnerability than CVE-2018-14041. | bootstrap 3.3.4 | |
| 4.3 | CVE-2018-20676 | In Bootstrap before 3.4.0, XSS is possible in the tooltip data-viewport attribute. | bootstrap 3.3.4 | |
| 4.3 | CVE-2019-14863 | There is a vulnerability in all angular versions before 1.5.0-beta.0, where after escaping the context of the web application, the web application delivers data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. | angular.js 1.4.14 | |
| 4.3 | CVE-2015-9251 | jQuery before 3.0.0 is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) attacks when a cross-domain Ajax request is performed without the dataType option, causing text/javascript responses to be executed. | jquery 1.11.1 | |
| 4.3 | CVE-2019-11358 | jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. | jquery 1.11.1 | |
| 4.3 | CVE-2020-11023 | In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. | jquery 1.11.1 | |
| 4.3 | CVE-2020-11022 | In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.2 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. | jquery 1.11.1 |
Vulnerability description
We noticed known vulnerabilities in the target application based on the server responses. They are usually related to outdated systems and expose the affected applications to the risk of unauthorized access to confidential data and possibly denial of service attacks. Depending on the system distribution the affected software can be patched but displays the same version, requiring manual checking.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could search for an appropriate exploit (or create one himself) for any of these vulnerabilities and use it to attack the system. Since the vulnerabilities were discovered using only version-based testing, the risk level for this finding will not exceed 'high' severity. Critical risks will be assigned to vulnerabilities identified through accurate active testing methods.
Recommendation
In order to eliminate the risk of these vulnerabilities, we recommend you check the installed software version and upgrade to the latest version.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-1026 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Cookie Name | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| https://www.willowpapery.com:443/ | _Nearby_session_ | Set-Cookie: .willowpapery.com |
Vulnerability description
We found that the target application sets cookies with a domain scope that is too broad. Specifically, cookies intended for use within a particular application are configured in such a way that they can be accessed by multiple subdomains of the same primary domain.
Risk description
The risk is that a cookie set for example.com may be sent along with the requests sent to dev.example.com, calendar.example.com, hostedsite.example.com. Potentially risky websites under your main domain may access those cookies and use the victim session from the main site.
Recommendation
The `Domain` attribute should be set to the origin host to limit the scope to that particular server. For example if the application resides on server app.mysite.com, then it should be set to `Domain=app.mysite.com`
Classification
| CWE | CWE-614 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Cookie Name | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| https://www.willowpapery.com:443/ | _Nearby_session_ | Set-Cookie: Nearby_session=NlFGcHVNNCtNSXMvbUJBNk1mSERFRjBsRUM1cHlCclhSblNuTERlUWdJYnBuRlZQUjZ1WllPaHNKQjZtQWFWdzdEaXdLME9nZnRicmxLWGV3U1dQVUJTWjlZZUNQZFEzSlhjcXRianNLZmpMLzd6RjNyTWYyNFgyNG9oejd1SFlwT0M4RC9xcHAzZWptUDBaMk9BdjZJMGZLUW83YS9PdHJMNENONzAvSzdxMWF0bExwcDEyTUE0ZGVJbVBZVkpWQVUwMmM2bzR1M29RUlFZdTFaTDd5UT09LS1KK0R1cEppRGhkTFVDNzE3Z210dVN3PT0%3D--271fbd9d8725f6da6202f8a2010589804f832ee4 |
Vulnerability description
We found that a cookie has been set without the Secure flag, which means the browser will send it over an unencrypted channel (plain HTTP) if such a request is made. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.
Risk description
The risk exists that an attacker will intercept the clear-text communication between the browser and the server and he will steal the cookie of the user. If this is a session cookie, the attacker could gain unauthorized access to the victim's web session.
Recommendation
Whenever a cookie contains sensitive information or is a session token, then it should always be passed using an encrypted channel. Ensure that the secure flag is set for cookies containing such sensitive information.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-614 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://www.willowpapery.com:443/ | Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.
Risk description
The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.
Recommendation
The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-693 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://www.willowpapery.com:443/ | Response headers do not include the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application lacks the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header in its responses. This security header is crucial as it instructs browsers to only establish secure (HTTPS) connections with the web server and reject any HTTP connections.
Risk description
The risk is that lack of this header permits an attacker to force a victim user to initiate a clear-text HTTP connection to the server, thus opening the possibility to eavesdrop on the network traffic and extract sensitive information (e.g. session cookies).
Recommendation
The Strict-Transport-Security HTTP header should be sent with each HTTPS response. The syntax is as follows: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=<seconds>[; includeSubDomains]` The parameter `max-age` gives the time frame for requirement of HTTPS in seconds and should be chosen quite high, e.g. several months. A value below 7776000 is considered as too low by this scanner check. The flag `includeSubDomains` defines that the policy applies also for sub domains of the sender of the response.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-693 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://www.willowpapery.com:443/ | Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.
Risk description
The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.
Recommendation
Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-693 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| AngularJS 1.4.14 | JavaScript frameworks |
| Babel | Miscellaneous |
| Bootstrap 3.3.4 | UI frameworks |
| core-js 2.6.12 | JavaScript libraries |
| Google Analytics | Analytics |
| GSAP 1.19.0 | JavaScript frameworks |
| jQuery 1.11.1 | JavaScript libraries |
| lit-element 4.1.1 | JavaScript libraries |
| Google Maps | Maps |
| Nginx | Web servers, Reverse proxies |
| Open Graph | Miscellaneous |
| React | JavaScript frameworks |
| Ruby | Programming languages |
| Ruby on Rails | Web frameworks |
| ScrollMagic 2.0.5 | JavaScript libraries |
| Select2 | JavaScript libraries |
| Stripe 2 | Payment processors |
| Webpack | Miscellaneous |
| WookMark | JavaScript libraries |
| reCAPTCHA | Security |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| Lodash 3.10.1 | JavaScript libraries |
| Cart Functionality | Ecommerce |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
Vulnerability description
We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.
Risk description
There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.
Recommendation
We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).
Evidence
Vulnerability description
Website is accessible.
Evidence
| URL | Method | Parameters | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.willowpapery.com:443/ | GET | Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 | Email Address: info@willowpapery.com |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that this web application exposes email addresses, which might be unintended. While not inherently a vulnerability, this information could be leveraged in social engineering or spam related activities.
Risk description
The risk is that exposed email addresses within the application could be accessed by unauthorized parties. This could lead to privacy violations, spam, phishing attacks, or other forms of misuse.
Recommendation
Compartmentalize the application to have 'safe' areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow email addresses to go outside of the trust boundary, and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-200 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Vulnerability description
We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.
Risk description
There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.
Recommendation
We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| Domain Queried | DNS Record Type | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| www.willowpapery.com | A | IPv4 address | 13.58.199.214 |
| www.willowpapery.com | NS | Name server | ns2.hover.com |
| www.willowpapery.com | NS | Name server | ns1.hover.com |
| www.willowpapery.com | MX | Mail server | 10 mx.hover.com.cust.hostedemail.com |
| www.willowpapery.com | SOA | Start of Authority | ns1.hover.com. dnsmaster.hover.com. 1720467415 1800 900 604800 300 |
| www.willowpapery.com | SPF | Sender Policy Framework | "v=spf1 include:_spf.hostedemail.com include:hover.com ~all" |
| www.willowpapery.com | CNAME | Canonical name | willowpapery.com |
Risk description
An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.
Recommendation
We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.
Evidence
| Operating System | Accuracy |
|---|---|
| Linux 3.10 - 4.11 | 95% |
Vulnerability description
OS Detection
Evidence
We managed to detect the redirect using the following Request / Response chain.
Recommendation
Vulnerability checks are skipped for ports that redirect to another port. We recommend scanning the redirected port directly.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Ruby | Programming languages |
| Google Maps | Maps |
| Ruby on Rails | Web frameworks |
| Nginx | Web servers, Reverse proxies |
| Stripe | Payment processors |
| reCAPTCHA | Security |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| Google Analytics | Analytics |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.