Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

https://m.nanhuai1g3fa.com/

Scanned target: https://m.nanhuai1g3fa.com/

Submitted: May 23, 2025 from GY

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

low

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

Title:	南华期货
Description:	No description found

IP Information

IP address	43.252.160.5
Country	HK
AS number	AS59371
Net name	Dimension Network & Communication Limited

IP address	103.48.7.18
Country	HK
AS number	AS59371
Net name	Dimension Network & Communication Limited

IP address	103.48.7.17
Country	HK
AS number	AS59371
Net name	Dimension Network & Communication Limited

IP address	103.48.5.21
Country	HK
AS number	AS59371
Net name	Dimension Network & Communication Limited

IP address	103.48.5.20
Country	HK
AS number	AS59371
Net name	Dimension Network & Communication Limited

IP address	103.48.5.19
Country	HK
AS number	AS59371
Net name	Dimension Network & Communication Limited

IP address	43.252.161.24
Country	HK
AS number	AS59371
Net name	Dimension Network & Communication Limited

IP address	43.252.161.23
Country	HK
AS number	AS59371
Net name	Dimension Network & Communication Limited

IP address	43.252.160.6
Country	HK
AS number	AS59371
Net name	Dimension Network & Communication Limited

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	cdn -
443/tcp	https	cdn -
5000/tcp	http	- -

Web Technologies

Software / Version	Category
Vue.js	JavaScript frameworks

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://m.nanhuai1g3fa.com/	Response headers do not include the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application lacks the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header in its responses. This security header is crucial as it instructs browsers to only establish secure (HTTPS) connections with the web server and reject any HTTP connections.

Risk description

The risk is that lack of this header permits an attacker to force a victim user to initiate a clear-text HTTP connection to the server, thus opening the possibility to eavesdrop on the network traffic and extract sensitive information (e.g. session cookies).

Recommendation

The Strict-Transport-Security HTTP header should be sent with each HTTPS response. The syntax is as follows: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=<seconds>[; includeSubDomains]` The parameter `max-age` gives the time frame for requirement of HTTPS in seconds and should be chosen quite high, e.g. several months. A value below 7776000 is considered as too low by this scanner check. The flag `includeSubDomains` defines that the policy applies also for sub domains of the sender of the response.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://m.nanhuai1g3fa.com/	Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the `<meta/>` tag with name 'referrer' is not present in the response.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.

Risk description

The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.

Recommendation

The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://m.nanhuai1g3fa.com/	Response headers do not include the X-Content-Type-Options HTTP security header

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the X-Content-Type-Options header. This header is particularly important for preventing Internet Explorer from reinterpreting the content of a web page (MIME-sniffing) and thus overriding the value of the Content-Type header.

Risk description

The risk is that lack of this header could make possible attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting or phishing in Internet Explorer browsers.

Recommendation

We recommend setting the X-Content-Type-Options header such as `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://m.nanhuai1g3fa.com/	Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.

Risk description

The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.

Recommendation

Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Vue.js	JavaScript frameworks

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Classification

OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
m.nanhuai1g3fa.com	A	IPv4 address	103.48.5.19
m.nanhuai1g3fa.com	A	IPv4 address	43.252.161.24
m.nanhuai1g3fa.com	A	IPv4 address	43.252.161.23
m.nanhuai1g3fa.com	A	IPv4 address	43.252.160.6
m.nanhuai1g3fa.com	A	IPv4 address	43.252.160.5
m.nanhuai1g3fa.com	A	IPv4 address	103.48.7.18
m.nanhuai1g3fa.com	A	IPv4 address	103.48.7.17
m.nanhuai1g3fa.com	A	IPv4 address	103.48.5.21
m.nanhuai1g3fa.com	A	IPv4 address	103.48.5.20
m.nanhuai1g3fa.com	CNAME	Canonical name	4grc7b6e-u.sa99566.com

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.