Vulnerability Scan Result
| Title: | Check Point Infinity Portal |
| Description: | The Infinity Portal represents a new paradigm in security management by delivering all the security capabilities of the Check Point Infinity architecture from a single pane of glass. With an Infinity Portal account, organizations secure and manage their entire IT infrastructure – networks, cloud, IoT, endpoints, and mobile – with a scalable, elastic, and cloud-based platform. The Infinity Portal provides unified management, providing security teams with unprecedented protections, visibility, control, and... |
| ip_address | 3.165.255.20 |
| country | US  |
| network_name | - |
| asn | - |
| ip_address | 3.165.255.112 |
| country | US |
| network_name | - |
| asn | - |
| ip_address | 3.165.255.64 |
| country | US |
| network_name | - |
| asn | - |
| ip_address | 3.165.255.105 |
| country | US |
| network_name | - |
| asn | - |
80/tcp | http | Amazon CloudFront httpd - |
443/tcp | https | CloudFront - |
No technologies could be detected.
Web Application Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://portal.checkpoint.com/dashboard/email&collaboration/CGS1 | Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.
Risk description
The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.
Recommendation
Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-693 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
Vulnerability description
Website is accessible.
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| Domain Queried | DNS Record Type | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| portal.checkpoint.com | A | IPv4 address | 3.165.255.20 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | A | IPv4 address | 3.165.255.64 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | A | IPv4 address | 3.165.255.112 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | A | IPv4 address | 3.165.255.105 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | NS | Name server | ns-15.awsdns-01.com |
| portal.checkpoint.com | NS | Name server | ns-1003.awsdns-61.net |
| portal.checkpoint.com | NS | Name server | ns-1265.awsdns-30.org |
| portal.checkpoint.com | NS | Name server | ns-1696.awsdns-20.co.uk |
| portal.checkpoint.com | MX | Mail server | 10 tls2.checkpoint.com |
| portal.checkpoint.com | MX | Mail server | 20 tls2-us.checkpoint.com |
| portal.checkpoint.com | SOA | Start of Authority | ns-15.awsdns-01.com. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | AAAA | IPv6 address | 2600:9000:2747:c00:8:7049:66c0:93a1 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | AAAA | IPv6 address | 2600:9000:2747:3200:8:7049:66c0:93a1 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | AAAA | IPv6 address | 2600:9000:2747:9e00:8:7049:66c0:93a1 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | AAAA | IPv6 address | 2600:9000:2747:a200:8:7049:66c0:93a1 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | AAAA | IPv6 address | 2600:9000:2747:c400:8:7049:66c0:93a1 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | AAAA | IPv6 address | 2600:9000:2747:ca00:8:7049:66c0:93a1 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | AAAA | IPv6 address | 2600:9000:2747:e000:8:7049:66c0:93a1 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | AAAA | IPv6 address | 2600:9000:2747:e600:8:7049:66c0:93a1 |
| portal.checkpoint.com | SPF | Sender Policy Framework | "v=spf1 ip4:168.245.53.137 ip4:168.245.62.130 ~all" |
Risk description
An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.
Recommendation
We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.
Evidence
Vulnerability description
OS detection couldn't determine the operating system.
Evidence
We managed to detect the redirect using the following Request / Response chain.
Recommendation
Vulnerability checks are skipped for ports that redirect to another port. We recommend scanning the redirected port directly.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Envoy | Reverse proxies |
| Nginx | Web servers, Reverse proxies |
| Amazon Web Services | PaaS |
| reCAPTCHA | Security |
| HSTS | Security |
| Amazon CloudFront | CDN |
| AWS Certificate Manager | SSL/TLS certificate authorities |
| HTTP/3 | Miscellaneous |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.