Vulnerability Scan Result

Target:

https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/Lists/Ajwaa_Feedback/DispForm.aspx?ID=5104

Scanned target: https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/Lists/Ajwaa_Feedback/DispForm.aspx?ID=5104

Submitted: May 21, 2025 from ST

Public Scan

Scan mode: Passive (non-intrusive)

Summary

medium

Info

Low

Medium

High

Critical

Screenshot

https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/Lists/Ajwaa_Feedback/DispForm.aspx?ID=5104

Title:	Ajwaa_Feedback - Hptoto: Tempat Pasang Togel Online Terbaik...
Description:	No description found

IP Information

IP address	185.141.15.102
Country	AE
AS number	AS202024
Net name	Ripe NCC ASN Block

Open Ports

80/tcp	http	F5 BIG-IP load balancer http proxy -
443/tcp	https	- -

Web Technologies

Software / Version	Category
Font Awesome 4.7.0	Font scripts
Bootstrap	UI frameworks
Google Analytics UA	Analytics
Google Font API	Font scripts
jQuery 3.6.0	JavaScript libraries
Matomo Analytics	Analytics
Moment.js	JavaScript libraries
Popper	Miscellaneous
Microsoft SharePoint \1	CMS
SweetAlert2 11	JavaScript libraries
Microsoft ASP.NET	Web frameworks
DigiCert	SSL/TLS certificate authorities
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
jsDelivr	CDN
JsObservable	JavaScript libraries
JsRender	JavaScript libraries
JsViews	JavaScript libraries
ReadSpeaker	Widgets
HSTS	Security

Web Application Vulnerabilities

Evidence

URL	Cookie Name	Evidence
https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/Lists/Ajwaa_Feedback/DispForm.aspx	TS012fbf26	Set-Cookie: TS012fbf26=01c7af7ea47a3a2c7c6813970f24c035ec233cdf943a929463e11a8f54e09fd46aa9cbb4dd4dfab90795847eb94d40c25abc312696

Vulnerability description

We found that a cookie has been set without the Secure flag, which means the browser will send it over an unencrypted channel (plain HTTP) if such a request is made. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.

Risk description

The risk exists that an attacker will intercept the clear-text communication between the browser and the server and he will steal the cookie of the user. If this is a session cookie, the attacker could gain unauthorized access to the victim's web session.

Recommendation

Whenever a cookie contains sensitive information or is a session token, then it should always be passed using an encrypted channel. Ensure that the secure flag is set for cookies containing such sensitive information.

Classification

CWE	CWE-614
OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Evidence

URL	Cookie Name	Evidence
https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/Lists/Ajwaa_Feedback/DispForm.aspx	TS012fbf26	Set-Cookie: .ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae

Vulnerability description

We found that the target application sets cookies with a domain scope that is too broad. Specifically, cookies intended for use within a particular application are configured in such a way that they can be accessed by multiple subdomains of the same primary domain.

Risk description

The risk is that a cookie set for example.com may be sent along with the requests sent to dev.example.com, calendar.example.com, hostedsite.example.com. Potentially risky websites under your main domain may access those cookies and use the victim session from the main site.

Recommendation

The `Domain` attribute should be set to the origin host to limit the scope to that particular server. For example if the application resides on server app.mysite.com, then it should be set to `Domain=app.mysite.com`

Classification

CWE	CWE-614
OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Evidence

URL	Cookie Name	Evidence
https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/Lists/Ajwaa_Feedback/DispForm.aspx	TS012fbf26	The server responded with Set-Cookie header(s) that does not specify the HttpOnly flag: Set-Cookie: TS012fbf26=01c7af7ea47a3a2c7c6813970f24c035ec233cdf943a929463e11a8f54e09fd46aa9cbb4dd4dfab90795847eb94d40c25abc312696

Vulnerability description

We found that a cookie has been set without the HttpOnly flag, which means it can be accessed by potentially malicious JavaScript code running inside the web page. The root cause for this usually revolves around misconfigurations in the code or server settings.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker who injects malicious JavaScript code on the page (e.g. by using an XSS attack) can access the cookie and can send it to another site. In case of a session cookie, this could lead to session hijacking.

Recommendation

Ensure that the HttpOnly flag is set for all cookies.

Classification

CWE	CWE-1004
OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/Lists/Ajwaa_Feedback/DispForm.aspx	Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.

Risk description

The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.

Recommendation

Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/Lists/Ajwaa_Feedback/DispForm.aspx	Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the `<meta/>` tag with name 'referrer' is not present in the response.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.

Risk description

The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.

Recommendation

The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Evidence

URL Evidence

URL	Evidence
https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/Lists/Ajwaa_Feedback/	Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:default-src: The default-src directive should be set as a fall-back when other restrictions have not been specified. script-src: script-src directive is missing. object-src: Missing object-src allows the injection of plugins which can execute JavaScript. We recommend setting it to 'none'. base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. frame-ancestors: This directive tells the browser whether you want to allow your site to be framed or not. By preventing a browser from framing your site you can defend against attacks like clickjacking. The recommended value is 'none' or 'self'.

https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/Lists/Ajwaa_Feedback/

Response headers include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header with the following security issues:default-src: The default-src directive should be set as a fall-back when other restrictions have not been specified. script-src: script-src directive is missing. object-src: Missing object-src allows the injection of plugins which can execute JavaScript. We recommend setting it to 'none'. base-uri: Missing base-uri allows the injection of base tags. They can be used to set the base URL for all relative (script) URLs to an attacker controlled domain. We recommend setting it to 'none' or 'self'. frame-ancestors: This directive tells the browser whether you want to allow your site to be framed or not. By preventing a browser from framing your site you can defend against attacks like clickjacking. The recommended value is 'none' or 'self'.

Vulnerability description

We noticed that the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header configured for the web application includes unsafe directives. The CSP header activates a protection mechanism implemented in web browsers which prevents exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities (XSS) by restricting the sources from which content can be loaded or executed.

Risk description

For example, if the unsafe-inline directive is present in the CSP header, the execution of inline scripts and event handlers is allowed. This can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the vulnerable application.

Recommendation

Remove the unsafe values from the directives, adopt nonces or hashes for safer inclusion of inline scripts if they are needed, and explicitly define the sources from which scripts, styles, images or other resources can be loaded.

Classification

CWE	CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Evidence

Software / Version	Category
Font Awesome 4.7.0	Font scripts
Bootstrap	UI frameworks
Google Analytics UA	Analytics
Google Font API	Font scripts
jQuery 3.6.0	JavaScript libraries
Matomo Analytics	Analytics
Moment.js	JavaScript libraries
Popper	Miscellaneous
Microsoft SharePoint \1	CMS
SweetAlert2 11	JavaScript libraries
Microsoft ASP.NET	Web frameworks
DigiCert	SSL/TLS certificate authorities
Google Tag Manager	Tag managers
jsDelivr	CDN
JsObservable	JavaScript libraries
JsRender	JavaScript libraries
JsViews	JavaScript libraries
ReadSpeaker	Widgets
HSTS	Security

Vulnerability description

We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.

Risk description

The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation

We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

Classification

OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Evidence

URL	Method	Parameters	Evidence
https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/Lists/Ajwaa_Feedback/DispForm.aspx	GET	Query: ID=5104 Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36	Email Address: labow49468@anypng.com

Vulnerability description

We noticed that this web application exposes email addresses, which might be unintended. While not inherently a vulnerability, this information could be leveraged in social engineering or spam related activities.

Risk description

The risk is that exposed email addresses within the application could be accessed by unauthorized parties. This could lead to privacy violations, spam, phishing attacks, or other forms of misuse.

Recommendation

Compartmentalize the application to have 'safe' areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow email addresses to go outside of the trust boundary, and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.

Classification

CWE	CWE-200
OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6: Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A4: Insecure Design

Evidence

URL
Missing: https://ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae/.well-known/security.txt

Vulnerability description

We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.

Risk description

There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.

Recommendation

We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.

Classification

OWASP Top 10 - 2017	A6 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2021	A5 - Security Misconfiguration

Infrastructure Vulnerabilities

Evidence

Domain Queried	DNS Record Type	Description	Value
ajwaa.gcaa.gov.ae	A	IPv4 address	185.141.15.102

Risk description

An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.

Recommendation

We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.