Vulnerability Scan Result
| Title: | 500億円超をマネーロンダリングか…グループリーダーの男（38）5回目逮捕 複数の特殊詐欺グループから依頼受け｜FNNプライムオンライン |
| Description: | 特殊詐欺グループがだましとった金を隠した疑いで、500億円以上をマネーロンダリングしていたとみられるグループのリーダーが再逮捕された。会社社長の林明旺容疑者（38）や中国人の瞿思豪容疑者（45）ら5人は、SNS型投資詐欺などでだまし取った現金8000万円を複数の口座に移転させるなどした疑いが持たれている。林容疑者らのグループは、タイやベトナムに拠点を置く複数の特殊詐欺グループから依頼を受けて、マネーロンダリングしていたという。林容疑者の逮捕は5回目で、警視庁はこのグループが500億円以上をマネ… |
| ip_address | 163.49.35.64 |
| country | JP  |
| network_name | Internet Initiative Japan Inc |
| asn | AS2497 |
80/tcp | http | - - |
443/tcp | https | - - |
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Amazon Advertising | Advertising |
| Lozad.js | JavaScript libraries, Performance |
| cdnjs | CDN |
| Microsoft Clarity 0.8.12 | Analytics |
| Google Hosted Libraries | CDN |
| Google Analytics | Analytics |
| jQuery 3.5.1 | JavaScript libraries |
| Open Graph | Miscellaneous |
| Rubicon Project | Advertising |
| Swiper | JavaScript libraries |
| PWA | Miscellaneous |
| Cloudflare | CDN |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| jsDelivr | CDN |
| Outbrain | Widgets, Advertising |
| HSTS | Security |
| RSS | Miscellaneous |
| Treasure Data 2.3.0 | Customer data platform |
| Cart Functionality | Ecommerce |
Web Application Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://www.fnn.jp/articles/-/886576 | Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application's server responses lack the Referrer-Policy HTTP header, which controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the current web application.
Risk description
The risk is that if a user visits a web page (e.g. "http://example.com/pricing/") and clicks on a link from that page going to e.g. "https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the `Referer` header, assuming the Referrer-Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.
Recommendation
The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The value `no-referrer` of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-693 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| URL | Evidence |
|---|---|
| https://www.fnn.jp/articles/-/886576 | Response does not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header or meta tag |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that the target application lacks the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in its HTTP responses. The CSP header is a security measure that instructs web browsers to enforce specific security rules, effectively preventing the exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.
Risk description
The risk is that if the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it easily exploitable by attackers.
Recommendation
Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the application.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-693 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Amazon Advertising | Advertising |
| Lozad.js | JavaScript libraries, Performance |
| cdnjs | CDN |
| Microsoft Clarity 0.8.12 | Analytics |
| Google Hosted Libraries | CDN |
| Google Analytics | Analytics |
| jQuery 3.5.1 | JavaScript libraries |
| Open Graph | Miscellaneous |
| Rubicon Project | Advertising |
| Swiper | JavaScript libraries |
| PWA | Miscellaneous |
| Cloudflare | CDN |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| jsDelivr | CDN |
| Outbrain | Widgets, Advertising |
| HSTS | Security |
| RSS | Miscellaneous |
| Treasure Data 2.3.0 | Customer data platform |
| Cart Functionality | Ecommerce |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.
Evidence
Vulnerability description
We found the robots.txt on the target server. This file instructs web crawlers what URLs and endpoints of the web application they can visit and crawl. Website administrators often misuse this file while attempting to hide some web pages from the users.
Risk description
There is no particular security risk in having a robots.txt file. However, it's important to note that adding endpoints in it should not be considered a security measure, as this file can be directly accessed and read by anyone.
Recommendation
We recommend you to manually review the entries from robots.txt and remove the ones which lead to sensitive locations in the website (ex. administration panels, configuration files, etc).
Evidence
Vulnerability description
Website is accessible.
Evidence
| URL | Method | Parameters | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.fnn.jp/articles/-/886576 | GET | Headers: User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 | Email Address: fnnjp.info@fujitv.co.jp |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that this web application exposes email addresses, which might be unintended. While not inherently a vulnerability, this information could be leveraged in social engineering or spam related activities.
Risk description
The risk is that exposed email addresses within the application could be accessed by unauthorized parties. This could lead to privacy violations, spam, phishing attacks, or other forms of misuse.
Recommendation
Compartmentalize the application to have 'safe' areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow email addresses to go outside of the trust boundary, and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
Classification
| CWE | CWE-200 |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2017 | |
| OWASP Top 10 - 2021 |
Evidence
Vulnerability description
We have noticed that the server is missing the security.txt file, which is considered a good practice for web security. It provides a standardized way for security researchers and the public to report security vulnerabilities or concerns by outlining the preferred method of contact and reporting procedures.
Risk description
There is no particular risk in not having a security.txt file for your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.
Recommendation
We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| Domain Queried | DNS Record Type | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| www.fnn.jp | A | IPv4 address | 163.49.35.64 |
Risk description
An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.
Recommendation
We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.
Evidence
Vulnerability description
OS detection couldn't determine the operating system.
Evidence
We managed to detect the redirect using the following Request / Response chain.
Recommendation
Vulnerability checks are skipped for ports that redirect to another port. We recommend scanning the redirected port directly.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Cart Functionality | Ecommerce |
| Treasure Data 2.3.0 | Customer data platform |
| reCAPTCHA | Security |
| Amazon Advertising | Advertising |
| HSTS | Security |
| Cloudflare | CDN |
| jsDelivr | CDN |
| Google Hosted Libraries | CDN |
| cdnjs | CDN |
| Swiper | JavaScript libraries |
| Outbrain | Widgets, Advertising |
| Microsoft Clarity 0.8.12 | Analytics |
| Lozad.js | JavaScript libraries, Performance |
| jQuery 3.5.1 | JavaScript libraries |
| Google Tag Manager | Tag managers |
| Google Analytics UA | Analytics |
| RSS | Miscellaneous |
| PWA | Miscellaneous |
| Open Graph | Miscellaneous |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.