Vulnerability Scan Result
| Title: | ZEN LENS |
| Description: | No description found |
| IP address | 15.197.225.128 |
| Country | US  |
| AS number | AS16509 |
| Net name | Amazon Inc |
| IP address | 3.33.251.168 |
| Country | US |
| AS number | AS16509 |
| Net name | Amazon Inc |
80/tcp | http | awselb/2.0 - |
443/tcp | https | - - |
Web Application Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities were found.
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities
Evidence
| Domain Queried | DNS Record Type | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| client.zen-lens.com | A | IPv4 address | 15.197.225.128 |
| client.zen-lens.com | A | IPv4 address | 3.33.251.168 |
| client.zen-lens.com | TXT | Text record | "google-site-verification=zXmE2At3GJ8jse0YXpDs4Hz-9UoPGpZCbLzTCWup1R0" |
Risk description
An initial step for an attacker aiming to learn about an organization involves conducting searches on its domain names to uncover DNS records associated with the organization. This strategy aims to amass comprehensive insights into the target domain, enabling the attacker to outline the organization's external digital landscape. This gathered intelligence may subsequently serve as a foundation for launching attacks, including those based on social engineering techniques. DNS records pointing to services or servers that are no longer in use can provide an attacker with an easy entry point into the network.
Recommendation
We recommend reviewing all DNS records associated with the domain and identifying and removing unused or obsolete records.
Evidence
Vulnerability description
OS detection couldn't determine the operating system.
Evidence
We managed to detect the redirect using the following Request / Response chain.
Recommendation
Vulnerability checks are skipped for ports that redirect to another port. We recommend scanning the redirected port directly.
Evidence
| Software / Version | Category |
|---|---|
| Amazon ELB | Load balancers |
| Amazon Web Services | PaaS |
Vulnerability description
We noticed that server software and technology details are exposed, potentially aiding attackers in tailoring specific exploits against identified systems and versions.
Risk description
The risk is that an attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.
Recommendation
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.